Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From UCiv:
Quote:Hi,
Today another 500 gold given.
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From UCiv:
Quote:That's OK for us. We join the anti-imba spy missions alliance
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From UCiv:
Quote:Hi,
500 more gold are on the way.
Posts: 15,316
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Sent to UCiv:
RB Wrote:Hey guys,
We weren't able to accept the 500gold gift in game, due to an issue with the aptmod. We requested it again in game, and would appreciate if you could log in an accept. Sorry for that! Weird glitch with the mod.
Would it also be possible for you to increase the gifted gold to 750? This would allow us to run 100% research this turn.
Thanks!
scooter - Team RB
Posts: 15,316
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Wow, a rare quick reply from UCiv:
UCiv Wrote:Deal accepted. I set another 500 gold for you.
By the way we do 545 gold / turn at maximal speed.
We have espionage on most civs - did you know that CFC have grenadiers in 5 turns?
Yuufo
Posts: 15,316
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Hail-Mary sent to Apolyton and CivPlayers:
RB Wrote:Apolyton and CivPlayers,
Hey guys, I wanted to run another idea past you both. I'm sending this to both of you because I'm sure any potential deal must include both of you. It's about what would be reasonable peace terms for you guys.
First off, nicely done so far. You guys have done an admirable job of working together, and overall I'm impressed by your smart play and teamwork. The tactical puzzle each turn has been genuinely interesting, and it continues to be that way. That said, I want to figure out what's best for both of us. I think we can say two things confidently here that you guys would agree with:
1) Each of you guys are probably able to take another city before our counter-attack begins in earnest.
2) You both see that we are about to get Rifling AND we still are comfortably #1 in soldiers, so we have plenty of gas in the tank, so there's a very finite limit to how far you guys can go.
Anyway, as I said previously, I see CFC as the big leader right now. Your main obstacle in the coming turns is that we have almost everything on your front or headed towards your front right now, and more is coming in every turn. When CFC joins on T175, we'll have no real ability to defend against that since we're in the process of throwing everything to your front. Us losing core cities doesn't matter too much to you, but CFC gaining all our best cities does since I figure the whole point of you declaring on us was to prevent a complete runaway . Our cities on the CFC front are our strongest cities, and if they pick up 7-8 of them (minimum) easily while you guys only gain 1-2 cities each, they will easily run away with this game - I can promise that. And no, we aren't going to abandon our front with you just because CFC moves in on us. If we're going to get dogpiled, we are going to find a way to win on one of the two fronts just for pride's sake . If we're going to die, we'll try to recapture what you've taken in the same way the German team did to WPC previously. So I see 2 ways the next 10-15 turns could unfold:
1) Our war continues. You guys pick up a couple cities, things grind to a halt when we've taken our shots at your stacks AND added Rifles to the mix. CFC joins, gains a bunch of big cities that we're unable to defend because we're tied down in the west. CFC becomes the new RB runaway, takes peace with us after they get what they want, and you guys are stuck with a long war with us. CFC runs away with an easy victory.
2) We agree to not contest your capture of a fair amount of cities in exchange for peace (explicit gifting is banned, but we can empty out cities for you to capture), and in return we'll prevent CFC from effectively winning the game by defending the big prizes in the east. You guys can freely integrate your new conquests with no problems from us while we are stuck slogging through another war with CFC. The end result I believe will be a world where Apolyton, CivPlayers, RB, and CFC are all pretty evenly matched through the end of the game. I think that's what you guys want, and that'll give you a better chance of victory in my opinion. In addition to not attempting to recapture Brick we would let you guys capture (or raze/replace) Ditchdigger, Mano Y Mano, PETA Crusaders, and Beyaz Penir without any further counter-attacks from us. Then we would both make lengthy peace, and we would go fend off our eastern enemy who will still have a sizable technology advantage against us.
How do you feel about this? I would be happy to chat further when you get some time.
Thanks,
scooter - Team RB
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From Apolyton:
Quote:Hey guys,
You mention the germans and wpc and that we could expect something like that: you use whatever you got against us and give cfc freebies. Thing is we were hesitating about going war against you, especially in this scale before your war started with inca, but once we saw how easily you acquired their whole empire and saw the potential of a run away we had no choice, but to play as determined as possible, and now we are honour bound to finish what we have started. To what length I can't say yet but if you let cfc easily capture your core cities, then i guess there will be no point of peace talking later.
If cfc will be the one who gains only from this war we can still hope that a simillar alliance will arise to stop them.
MZ.
Posts: 15,316
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Sent to CivFr:
RB Wrote:CivFr,
So I know you guys never respond to email, but you need some reality a little bit here. Here's what's about to happen:
1) We are defending our western front from two attackers that are ahead of us technologically. We're going to lose more cities than we have already, not much that can be done.
2) We aren't winning this game. We may survive this war, sure, but we're going to lose quite a bit more
3) Starting on T175, CFC is going to attack our other side. We have nothing there because we are defending our other front. If you see CivStats, they are going to walk in with a ton of units. They will capture all our best cities full of mature towns, and we will not be able to stop them.
The conclusion of this is CFC will easily run away with this game. They'll add 20 or so cities to their count, capturing a few valuable wonders in the process. The game will be effectively won in 20T by the team that back-stabbed you. The only way this game is salvaged is if you guys push out an army hard right now and attack CFC immediately. If you do this, and we survive, we'll put our full efforts into helping you win instead of CFC for the remainder of the game. If not, we'll all be conceding to CFC by T200, and I don't think either of us want that.
If you still care about winning the game, contact me soon.
Thanks,
scooter - Team RB
September 1st, 2013, 15:13
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From CivFr:
Quote:Hi,
My apologies for all your unanswered messages.
We just sign peace and a NAP with CFC.
Bye,
Mayans
September 2nd, 2013, 12:15
Posts: 15,316
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Sent to UCiv:
RB Wrote:Hey guys, thanks again for the gold funding. We're keeping track of how much we owe you - getting pretty close to Rifling. We requested some more gold in game so we can continue running 100% - can you login and accept that?
Thanks,
scooter - Team RB
|