Gaspar Wrote:but why in the hell would I feel a need to justify my first vote of the day?
Well, you did. At least that's the way I read it. "My vote on X was a joke vote, but he was suspicious for reason Y. Also, reason Z which supports reason Y." If there's a different way to read it, or you meant something differently than what came out, feel free to clarify.
As for why you would justify your "joke" vote? Maybe you're a wolf and started feeling a little heat. Zak mentioned the hostile tone, but that whole post was overreacting to a pair of innocent early votes. So you throw in a parenthetical "well, it was a joke vote but it wasn't a bad vote" justification.
Gaspar Wrote:I do enjoy your stealthy "Day 1 asides can matter" trying to plant a seed for a later screed no doubt. Deciding if its worth taking the Pepsi Challenge to see if you can mislynch me in the quiktopic? :oldwink:
Uh, no. It was a reference to WW12, when Ichabod correctly called out on an innocuous line on Day 1. Really, though, this whole statement is delusional. I'm not a wolf but even if I was I wouldn't do any of that.