Mattimeo Wrote:Too many people, no concrete information, I can't make sense of what's going on :/
Lots of people jumping on other people for minor things they say, any wonder why I'm trying to skip out on this whole process? Sure, I don't necessarily *need* to stay alive for a town win, but there's little point in playing if I can't at least make it to the parts of the game I actually enjoy (fewer people, more known info, actual relations to dead scum to base arguments off, rather than theorised relations to possible scum)...
Voting Tasunke. His claim seems to eliminate town-aligned power roles for him, leaving open vanilla town, or all scum. So he has the highest simple chance of being scum. And if it's wrong, he's not a power role, so we're not losing anything too badly.
Actually Jkaen, I think that is one of the dumbest arguments I've heard in a long time. Mattimeo states that Tasunke can only be vanilla town or scum because of his claim and therefore has the highest chance of being scum. Thats bullshit. If we believe that Tasunke has said the truth, he is a vanilla villager. %-chance to be scum: 0. If we believe that Tasunke lied, he could as well be a village-PR. %-chance to be scum: As high as for everyone else.
I mean really, either you believe Tasunkes claim. In that case there is no reason to vote for him at all. Or you believe that he lied - in that case, do you believe he is scum (then of course vote for him) or do you believe he wanted to not give away being a PR (in that case don't vote). But voting for him because "even if he said the truth, we at least don't lose a PR"... really?
Mattimeo