WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[Qgqqqqq]

Sorry in advance for a) wall of text and b) multiquoting which people seem to hate

Exams on a sunday, really?

No, I had exams on a monday, we are in different time zones obviously different.

Qg can be coherent. I think he was posting in a much more articulate fashion in WW15 and elsewhere on the forum that I've seen him comment. This game though seems like a descent into incomprehensibility.

Why? I think if I was a wolf, I might well advise Qg to play up an angle of being a "weird" poster, who tend to be unlynchable while also not being expected to contribute a lot.

Qg

I would like to strongly refute that. I do generally try to post gramatically correct, but here is an early example of me posting from old hardware http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showthrea...post250060 As you can see the character limit is clear.

@Rowain, @Pindicator:

I dont have much time to set up a full dossier on each player right now, but I will do a short writeup:
...
[SIZE="4"]5) Qgqqqqq: the Student[/SIZE]
wasn't seeing the case against him very strong. Don't know why he was equivocating between uberfish and catwalk yesterday, but an avoidance of thestick BW may be it.
...
so.... im a bit embarrassed by the number of "no reads" I just havent taken very good notes about individual posts/actions this game. I also would like to review yesterday's voting - I am just taking people at their word for the exact sequence of events.

with the limited info above, if I'd have to pick 5 more wolves, it would be:

uberfish
pindicator
Qgqqqqq
Arromir

...

Thanks Waterbat! I at least find these interesting to read. About thwe bolded points on the other hand, I have a problem.
Having just looked up "equivocating," I apologise. Again I have not had much time recently and this had an effect on explaining. I do think however that I have covered these since, but just to make sure.
It was not a switch back-and-forth as you and others make it out to be. My quoting Uber was because I didn't have enough time to explain, not beacause I think he is innocent.
I avoided the main targets, because I had no real read on any of them, and tbh thought the town was by voting for them. As it turns out I was wrong, proving once more that I am bad at WW.

Please tell me what the village-read from Selrahc is based upon.

And again I'm absolutly uninterested in gettin lists of 20-something names with at least 50% 'no read', 'might be village or not' - shit tacked on them.

Please if you are a villager think whom you suspect the most ( 2-3 names are enough) and make your case there. Everything else is just useless clutter.

Sorry! I honestly thought that was what you wanted, and besides I think that is actually useful as it helps me to make sure I don't make any mistakes
That said I'll make a seperate post on suspects.
FYI the % scale was with thestick at 0% and Zakalwe at 100%

...

On an aside, I think its very scummy to ask what Mattimeo did specifically. But I don't think its scummy to ask his rationale behind not protecting zak. So, eh, wtf Matt?

Indeed. I think considering Matt is not cleared in many peoples eyes an explanation of actions (even if we avoid saying specifics) would be very useflu for confirming your role.

...
Regarding qqq his original statement was that he voted me because of a "slew" of confusing posts, he's clarified that to my attack on Novice only and I find that explanation acceptable. However I'm still confused as to why he talked about unvoting (and whom he was referring to.)
....

Sorry, by unvoting I meant that my vote probably wasn't going to be of any use parked on you, a practical non-vote, and that I didn't have any reads on any of the lynch targets, so did not want to influence the result when I felt that I had no idea either way.

On Qg - I agree on waiting to hear more until he has access to a better device to communicate with. What bothers me most his series of posts is how the quality degrades over time. It feels panicky. Does anyone remember if he was under significant pressure last game?
...

I was not "panicky" last night. Instead I was physically exhausted and trying to post a defence that probably ought to have waited to this morning.
The descent into incomprehensibility is as I try to get out the posts fast so that I can go to bed.
And no, even if this harms my defence, I never felt under much pressure in WW15.

Qgqqqqqqqqqqqq

Uhh novice do you think

a) My response was stupid and didn't explain
b)My post quality, charcter limit, something? felt shoddy and unbelievable
c) Posting history is not justified
d) None of the above (please try to compose something, as it is not giving me anything to defend otherwise)

That's exactly what I argued about thestick. And you suspect me for it? I didn't post much the first day and a half, and the game started 5 minutes after my bedtime. My activity has not been inconsistent with what I claimed it would be.

Merovech sounded off to me after the lynch. He was quick to blame me for my role in almost saving thestick while cavalierly dismissing his own more subtle part. Other favourite suspect is Q, mainly because novice seems to feel strongly about him.

This is my point!

Catwalk think for yourself and post actual reasoning rather then " smart guy over there says it. He been right before maybe he right this time too [hit rocks together].
Sorry if I sound frustrated, this is not supposed to be personal.

Thanks if you actually read this, suspects coming later.