Tasunke Wrote:So twinkletoes, Azza ... what do you think about the Sareln lynch?
And for the Sareln voters, what do you think about the Uberfish lynch?
I'd be happy to see either of these scum hang today ...
To me are not the arguments basically the same for both of them, shitty voting records on day 1?
I fail in that case to see how you can be strongly for any one of them and agaisnt the other unless there is extra factors I am unaware of
Twinkletoes89 Wrote:From what I have read about the Sareln lynch, I don't see a case that convinces me. If he wasn't a lurker, I don't think the case would have come about. 'Lynch a Lurker' policy seems to me to be more favourable to the wolves than the village as I think the chances of a mislynch are higher.
I'm not trying to make the Uberfish lynch seem like the best idea ever, I'm simply explaining why I think he (in my mind) is the best candidate for a lynch. I believe his guilt more than anyone else so I'm trying to move the lynch away from those I am uncertain of (at best), to someone who just seems to be giving off mafia vibes to me.
The Sareln voting isn't lynch a lurker, as I said I think its exactly the same reason I understand uberfish is being strung up, poor timing on switches on day 1.
Qgqqqqq Wrote:The way I see it TT main argtment agains uber (yeah lets not touch the matt paranoia) is omg ge voted for me, im innocent so he must be evil!
If tt has another argument, please point it out but thats all i get from 805
Agree
Tasunke Wrote:I suppose for now I will vote Uberfish, but for the record its getting hard to keep track of how many votes each person has!
Why Uberfish?