Lewwyn, Zak accused me of trying to make a case against other player right about the time where thestick started to get traction. His attack had nothing to do with my thought s on thestick himself, from what I can tell. You did the same thing. When thestick started to get a lot of traction (you were voting for him), you switched to Bigger and Catwalk later. That's the same thing Zak accused me of doing, trying to find another lynch tarbet when thestick started to get traction.
You completely switched focus now, talking about the fact I pointed thestick as a nice target and you voted for him. That was not what zak pointed out, at least not in my opinion. By the way, go back and read how my post regarding thestick was made on the early parts of day 1. I wasn't certain of thestick guilt and I was trying to find other leads
---
I don't own your head to undersatnd what it's the most relevant parts of your argument. To me, all you said was that Zak case was good and bolded parts of it, which I tried to explain (why would you emphasize those lines if they weren't the relevant parts - how am I supposed to know that?).
And you also selected parts of my post to ignore in your new attack, including ones where I make direct questions to you. I also see you twisting things to fit your arguments. That's because our heads work differently and from a bunch of information, we consider different parts of it more relevant. You say i do it on purpose, because I'm a wolf, but that's just normal human behaviour.
---
Now you come and say that you have your own case against me, not only repeating Zak. Go and read your first post to see if it isn't possible for me to understanmd that you were only quoting Zak (look at that "this one is for you, Zak" comment, for example). Now go and find all other votes against me and you'll see that EVERYONE JUST QUOTES ZAK. Can't you see how this makes me angry?
Maybe I answered bad to your suspicions, but that was only because I didn't understand them as you wanted me to. But at least you tried to voice your suspicions. Everyone else just followed Zak. You are wrong about me, the same way Zak was (and he was a villager). The fact that you came forward and made your case makes you look better as a villager in my eyes. But can't you see that everyone else is just sailing? You made your case 1 whole day after Zak's case and NO ONE ELSE HAS SAID ANYTHING AGAINST ME OTHER THAN ZAK'S CASE! You are burrying yourself here, Lewwyn. Look at the whole picture and you'll see just a bunch of sailers. And you have to admit that your case stands strongly on the fact that I mentioned you in my early defense to Zak (which wasn't just a coincidence, because I suspected you way more than I suspect you know than). So it's a bunch of sailers + your personal reasons. This is a classic mislynch. Seriously!! We should look at the sailors.
Please, go and read my comment about Gsapar, the one that make Zak suspicious of me, without the hindsight of knowing that thestick is guilty. And taking into account that it was extremely early game. I was fishing for suspicious in that post. There was a lot of noise, a lot players. Can't you see that my gut against Gaspar is just the same as Zakalwe's gut against thestick. But he was considered a hero due to that and I'm going to be lynched.
After that I went away for the weekend. That's why my comment about thestick looks so bad. BUT I WAS AWAY!!!! I LOST THE VOTE DEADLINE!!! Seriously..... CAN'T YOU SEE HOW BAD THAT MADE ME LOOK!?!?!?! I WOULDN'T DO THAT IF I WAS A MAFIA, BECAUSE I CAN'T PLAY BADLY WHEN I'M ON A TEAM, THAT WOULD MAKE ME FEEL VERY, VERY BAD WITH MYSELF!!!! GASPAR KNOWS THIS, HE POINTED THAT OUT IN ANOTHER GAME AND THE FACT THAT HE FORGOT IT NOW IS VERY SUSPICIOUS!!!
Of course I got agressive after those posts... It was not agressive, but indignant, since I was being wrongly accused. First by Zak, who hardly changes his mind. But before I could try to make him change his mind he was killed and I had to put up with everyone just quoting him and not reading my defenses.
Than you make a case (the first one after Zak) and I had trouble finding out what was the important bits of it (that's entirely possible). That's it!!!! It's not a devious scheme to get you killed or whatever. If you make me a question I'll answer, I won't run from it. But you can't expect me to just know...
---
This is my whole game explained until now. Hope it makes things more clear.... Sorry that this was written in a rush...
You completely switched focus now, talking about the fact I pointed thestick as a nice target and you voted for him. That was not what zak pointed out, at least not in my opinion. By the way, go back and read how my post regarding thestick was made on the early parts of day 1. I wasn't certain of thestick guilt and I was trying to find other leads
---
I don't own your head to undersatnd what it's the most relevant parts of your argument. To me, all you said was that Zak case was good and bolded parts of it, which I tried to explain (why would you emphasize those lines if they weren't the relevant parts - how am I supposed to know that?).
And you also selected parts of my post to ignore in your new attack, including ones where I make direct questions to you. I also see you twisting things to fit your arguments. That's because our heads work differently and from a bunch of information, we consider different parts of it more relevant. You say i do it on purpose, because I'm a wolf, but that's just normal human behaviour.
---
Now you come and say that you have your own case against me, not only repeating Zak. Go and read your first post to see if it isn't possible for me to understanmd that you were only quoting Zak (look at that "this one is for you, Zak" comment, for example). Now go and find all other votes against me and you'll see that EVERYONE JUST QUOTES ZAK. Can't you see how this makes me angry?
Maybe I answered bad to your suspicions, but that was only because I didn't understand them as you wanted me to. But at least you tried to voice your suspicions. Everyone else just followed Zak. You are wrong about me, the same way Zak was (and he was a villager). The fact that you came forward and made your case makes you look better as a villager in my eyes. But can't you see that everyone else is just sailing? You made your case 1 whole day after Zak's case and NO ONE ELSE HAS SAID ANYTHING AGAINST ME OTHER THAN ZAK'S CASE! You are burrying yourself here, Lewwyn. Look at the whole picture and you'll see just a bunch of sailers. And you have to admit that your case stands strongly on the fact that I mentioned you in my early defense to Zak (which wasn't just a coincidence, because I suspected you way more than I suspect you know than). So it's a bunch of sailers + your personal reasons. This is a classic mislynch. Seriously!! We should look at the sailors.
Please, go and read my comment about Gsapar, the one that make Zak suspicious of me, without the hindsight of knowing that thestick is guilty. And taking into account that it was extremely early game. I was fishing for suspicious in that post. There was a lot of noise, a lot players. Can't you see that my gut against Gaspar is just the same as Zakalwe's gut against thestick. But he was considered a hero due to that and I'm going to be lynched.
After that I went away for the weekend. That's why my comment about thestick looks so bad. BUT I WAS AWAY!!!! I LOST THE VOTE DEADLINE!!! Seriously..... CAN'T YOU SEE HOW BAD THAT MADE ME LOOK!?!?!?! I WOULDN'T DO THAT IF I WAS A MAFIA, BECAUSE I CAN'T PLAY BADLY WHEN I'M ON A TEAM, THAT WOULD MAKE ME FEEL VERY, VERY BAD WITH MYSELF!!!! GASPAR KNOWS THIS, HE POINTED THAT OUT IN ANOTHER GAME AND THE FACT THAT HE FORGOT IT NOW IS VERY SUSPICIOUS!!!
Of course I got agressive after those posts... It was not agressive, but indignant, since I was being wrongly accused. First by Zak, who hardly changes his mind. But before I could try to make him change his mind he was killed and I had to put up with everyone just quoting him and not reading my defenses.
Than you make a case (the first one after Zak) and I had trouble finding out what was the important bits of it (that's entirely possible). That's it!!!! It's not a devious scheme to get you killed or whatever. If you make me a question I'll answer, I won't run from it. But you can't expect me to just know...
---
This is my whole game explained until now. Hope it makes things more clear.... Sorry that this was written in a rush...