I would like to ask of Bigger, Waterbat, Selrahc, Uberfish, and Molach to please, please switch to Sareln.
Of you, I hope, you could see the wisdom in voting Sareln at this time. As a villager he has learned how to lurk *well*. I will admit that in WW11? 12? He played a good WW game, but right now it seems that the wolves may be trying some sort of *cute* strategy or something because, other than propping Novice up for mayor, I haven't seen any clever plays yet enacted by the wolves (that I could see). Therefore, I can see how even though Sareln played a wolf well in that game, he might not be able to now. Particularly telling is with how much vigor Novice and Gaspar defended his "innocence."
What is interesting is that Sareln's argument against his lynch (or rather, his argument directly towards me at least) is that I have been simply repeating the same idea with little to no evidence. His adoption of two wolf-based BWs seems, at least to me, to at least be moderate evidence (or at least little to moderate evidence) ... but NO evidence? The fact that he would emphasize an idea that there is no evidence whatsoever (what he did) or even to simply place it on the continuous range (zero to little vs little to moderate) seems, to me, an exagerration.
Bigger, you have voted Sareln in the past, perhaps you could better explain to the other Uberfish voters as to why a Sareln lynch makes sense?
Uberfish, if you switch your vote off of Twinkletoes ... if you can take a step back and look at other targets, perhaps he will be less inclined to revenge vote you, or whatnot, and perhaps he will also be willing to vote for Sareln. If both the Uberfish and Twinkletoes pushes could return to Sareln, I would consider this village a much safer place.
Not really sure what to think about the Ichabod wagon ... but I KNOW* that we should have a good lynch with Sareln. So I would ask the Ichabod voters to reconsider Sareln.
*well, obviously I don't know, but still.
Of you, I hope, you could see the wisdom in voting Sareln at this time. As a villager he has learned how to lurk *well*. I will admit that in WW11? 12? He played a good WW game, but right now it seems that the wolves may be trying some sort of *cute* strategy or something because, other than propping Novice up for mayor, I haven't seen any clever plays yet enacted by the wolves (that I could see). Therefore, I can see how even though Sareln played a wolf well in that game, he might not be able to now. Particularly telling is with how much vigor Novice and Gaspar defended his "innocence."
What is interesting is that Sareln's argument against his lynch (or rather, his argument directly towards me at least) is that I have been simply repeating the same idea with little to no evidence. His adoption of two wolf-based BWs seems, at least to me, to at least be moderate evidence (or at least little to moderate evidence) ... but NO evidence? The fact that he would emphasize an idea that there is no evidence whatsoever (what he did) or even to simply place it on the continuous range (zero to little vs little to moderate) seems, to me, an exagerration.
Bigger, you have voted Sareln in the past, perhaps you could better explain to the other Uberfish voters as to why a Sareln lynch makes sense?
Uberfish, if you switch your vote off of Twinkletoes ... if you can take a step back and look at other targets, perhaps he will be less inclined to revenge vote you, or whatnot, and perhaps he will also be willing to vote for Sareln. If both the Uberfish and Twinkletoes pushes could return to Sareln, I would consider this village a much safer place.
Not really sure what to think about the Ichabod wagon ... but I KNOW* that we should have a good lynch with Sareln. So I would ask the Ichabod voters to reconsider Sareln.
*well, obviously I don't know, but still.