I don't know if anyone has raised the idea that zak might have been killed off, in preference to other high-profile targets, specifically because of his anti-Ichabod post. Specifically, the fact it could be used to mount a reasonably effective attack without zak there to clarify points, or back down later.
Indeed, most of the arguments against Ichabod seem to be pulled directly from zak's post, which is making me slightly suspicious of the whole wagon...
So I have to ask - why do you not care which of them is lynched?
I'm keeping my vote on Sareln. Not really liking how fast that uber-wagon formed.
Indeed, most of the arguments against Ichabod seem to be pulled directly from zak's post, which is making me slightly suspicious of the whole wagon...
Bigger Wrote:this is not strange at all. I have said all day I want Sareln OR uberfish, I think most of the Sareln voters suspected uberfish as well. Apparently Sareln has done a good job defending himself, (I still think he's guilty, but whatever) so as soon as it seemed easier to lynch uberfish than Sareln I was happy to switch.I don't get this idea of being happy to switch between the two. I cannot countenance the idea that they are both scum, given the similarity in the jump onto me, off me and onto you - scum doing things identically just seems like a really bad plan, at the best of times.
So I have to ask - why do you not care which of them is lynched?
I'm keeping my vote on Sareln. Not really liking how fast that uber-wagon formed.