Your questioning did stand out, you'll recall I reacted to it as well. What compelled you to do this? Again, it doesn't look clear-cut scummy to me. It makes good sense as scum to safely poke less active players and get them to contribute, it also makes safe as a townie to want people to contribute. Your approach struck me as a little odd, though. Rather than post votes and state suspicions of less active players (as I have done on Azza), you kindly ask us to post.
I might vote for you if you're on the block by lynch time, but failing that I don't see a strong case on you. I would much rather investigate the uberfish trio: Azza, Merovech and Arromir. I still think the fact that they're getting so little attention (mainly Azza and Arromir) suggests that a large group of players (= scum) have no interest in suspicions being poked towards those 3.
Now please don't hang me for independent thought or I'll have to duct tape myself to novice again
On that note, though:
I might vote for you if you're on the block by lynch time, but failing that I don't see a strong case on you. I would much rather investigate the uberfish trio: Azza, Merovech and Arromir. I still think the fact that they're getting so little attention (mainly Azza and Arromir) suggests that a large group of players (= scum) have no interest in suspicions being poked towards those 3.
Now please don't hang me for independent thought or I'll have to duct tape myself to novice again
On that note, though:novice Wrote:b) Early vote parking on players not proved to be scum. (Bigger, Pindicator)That was a bizarre expression. I thought you meant to imply "players proven not be scum", but since you include pindicator that's very much not the case. Vote parking on pindicator is suspicious? We suddenly know pindicator is innocent? Not following at all here.