Gaspar Wrote:Rowain, I find it interesting that you've latched onto the piggybacking accusation but not so much the low content one. I guess my issue is this - if you liked the pindicator lynch so much that you parked your vote on him all day, I would expect that you would have come back to it and try and convince others, as you would expect strong feelings about it given that you never wavered. We know you had time to do this since you were playing Columbo with everyone else all day, but you didn't. That's why it looks like a scummy vote park rather than a village conviction. And if you were so convinced, why have you not made said case today instead of just getting annoyed? I can't speak for the others but what I'd like is some insight from you, in theory you are picking this up given your aggressive evidence gathering.
I have answered your other point as well. And no I don't campaign for a lynch. I didn't do it for Bigger , I didn't do it for pindi and I won't do it for Selrahc (or any othe suspect).
I give reason why I vote the way I do, I answer questions but I don't campaign. You can accept it or not thats your problem. As far as I know both my questions to the various people as their answers are public visible so everyone here can read them and draw their own conclusions which is BTW also a way to find scum.