novice Wrote:Gaspar's case was mainly based on your day 2 performance.
I wonder how you missed that.
Good that you mention it. Have you read Gaspars post? Have you thought about it? have you verfified it? because this
Gaspar Wrote:In the spoiler is 9 solid posts where he's asking about other people's reads and sharing none of his own.
And... really that's all of day 2. There's another dozen similar posts. I've looked through Waterbats skimmer like 15 times and everytime its "Hey so and so, what do you think about this?" without once ever really explaining how he feels about anything.
Are blatant lies. I have for example talked about pindicator and Sareln used my atrgumentation for his magnus opus. Why do you find Sareln work as so clear villagerish but mine which said the same but several hours before Sareln and was the reason why I was on him gets completly neglected. Oh and the time I made this post (and switched a while later) you were still on Qg and for some time I was the only one voting pindicato so much for nothing original.
Isn't it strange that Gaspar missed this post? Isn't it strange that this is a second case where he obmits a post I made because it would not fit into his theorie? What conclusions do you draw from that?
Gaspar has told the untruth about my Day1 and has told the untruth about my day2. All to make a case and the appearance of beeing active.