I'll respond to the allegations first then give some thoughts in a follow-up.
My main regret this game is that I haven't been able to be as active as I normally am. I think my activity level is pretty constant regardless of which role I draw, if you look at WW7 which is the only game I actually lived long enough as scum for it to be relevant I was one of the more active participants all the way to endgame, so I'm not the type to go lurker when I roll wolf. I just haven't had consistent time since Night 2. Anyway, nobody cares about that so I'll move along but that's what I actually feel guilty about so I thought I'd start with it.
So let's see, the rest of the case is that I defended Mattimeo on the first wagon and I've voted incorrectly at every turn. Well, on Mattimeo I don't think my defense was a particular push for his innocence but rather a "let's not lynch our protective role unless we're really frigging sure." I made two posts questioning him, the first was before the Injera claim so all I was going off was his generally sketchy behavior and the second was before the Qgqqqqq claim where I legitimately thought it might not be a bad idea to let the Injera-Mattimeo test play out. I still think it was pretty risky even though the result was good, I don't love the process.
In terms of my "voting incorrectly" that's a pretty gross overstatement in a game where we've had 2 scum lynches. I said before and I'll say again that I think its way too convenient to just assume all the scum avoided Mattimeo and its a path to losing the game. But specifically, which of my incorrect votes is suspicious? I feel alright about all of my votes because I think the reasoning behind each was logical. You can't to worked up about being wrong in these games, just the nature of them is you're going to be wrong a lot.
If there is something in particular someone would like me to answer for, by all means, but I didn't see anything else in anyone else's attacks other than novices.
My main regret this game is that I haven't been able to be as active as I normally am. I think my activity level is pretty constant regardless of which role I draw, if you look at WW7 which is the only game I actually lived long enough as scum for it to be relevant I was one of the more active participants all the way to endgame, so I'm not the type to go lurker when I roll wolf. I just haven't had consistent time since Night 2. Anyway, nobody cares about that so I'll move along but that's what I actually feel guilty about so I thought I'd start with it.
So let's see, the rest of the case is that I defended Mattimeo on the first wagon and I've voted incorrectly at every turn. Well, on Mattimeo I don't think my defense was a particular push for his innocence but rather a "let's not lynch our protective role unless we're really frigging sure." I made two posts questioning him, the first was before the Injera claim so all I was going off was his generally sketchy behavior and the second was before the Qgqqqqq claim where I legitimately thought it might not be a bad idea to let the Injera-Mattimeo test play out. I still think it was pretty risky even though the result was good, I don't love the process.
In terms of my "voting incorrectly" that's a pretty gross overstatement in a game where we've had 2 scum lynches. I said before and I'll say again that I think its way too convenient to just assume all the scum avoided Mattimeo and its a path to losing the game. But specifically, which of my incorrect votes is suspicious? I feel alright about all of my votes because I think the reasoning behind each was logical. You can't to worked up about being wrong in these games, just the nature of them is you're going to be wrong a lot.
If there is something in particular someone would like me to answer for, by all means, but I didn't see anything else in anyone else's attacks other than novices.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?