Pindicator made an opening post almost as scummy as Thestick's. Serdoa pounced on it, read his post with quotes to see the full context.
I agreed:
Pindicator's reply, suddenly he was voting Bigger for a completely different reason. You don't come into the game annoyed about metagaming, and them vote someone because they're making joke votes. Those are two unrelated things. This reeks of scum justifying a vote.
As you can see Pindicator even follows up with defending Thestick in the same post.
Nobody was gaining any real traction, except Thestick who had four pretty committed people voting for him. At that point Rowain makes a really bad post:
Throwing suspicion on the Thestick voters without commenting on the original case against Thestick. He also fished for an Uberfish wagon later, as TT points out.
Serdoa Wrote:I'm too sick of it. Nearly as much as I am sick of badly made-up votes... speaking of that:
You know pindicator, I REALLY am sick of meta-discussions and I'd vote in a heartbeat for anyone trying to start a discussion on if the "role" of a player does mean something. But out of your 4 Bigger-quotes there is only 1 which could be attributed to that, the last one about Lewwyn. All the others? Obviously joking around. That leads me to what I wrote first: I hate made-up votes, and your vote on Bigger is just made-up in order to vote for him. You can't tell me that you didn't see yourself that his quotes and your "reason" for voting for him don't really match. Therefore
[color=red]pindicator
I agreed:
novice Wrote:Agree with Serdoa on Pin - Pin, how could you take Bigger's posts like metagaming? More like you had decided to vote someone for that reason, and Bigger fit the bill.
Pindicator's reply, suddenly he was voting Bigger for a completely different reason. You don't come into the game annoyed about metagaming, and them vote someone because they're making joke votes. Those are two unrelated things. This reeks of scum justifying a vote.
pindicator Wrote:everybody starts with joke votes, I get that. But 4 posts and every one of them is a joke? If he contributes better I have no problem changing my vote, but every post being a joke is not helpful. Yeah, so I messed up the terminology for it -- i'll grant that -- but it's still distraction
Really could say the same thing about your 2nd post as well
re: thestick - isn't 20 questions how he played it last game as a villager? i was pretty convinced he was scum last game, and wrong, which makes me want to see more from thestick before deciding towards him
re: tasunke - same thing, i want to see more. his day 1 reveals are so predictable now it looks like he even realizes he has to do it otherwise he'll look fishy. So I agree with novice, his reveal tells nothing. Although today's reveal seems to be the least amount of pressure he was under before revealing.
As you can see Pindicator even follows up with defending Thestick in the same post.
Nobody was gaining any real traction, except Thestick who had four pretty committed people voting for him. At that point Rowain makes a really bad post:
Rowain Wrote:Yes please cut it in future
Interesting that you attack thestick for his very first post here (of course only after zak suspected him) and then use his 8th or so post in another game to support it.
But even more interesting to note Bigger's eagerness to jump on the waggon and his announcing to jump another waggon(injera) once it forms.
FTM staying on Jkaen
Throwing suspicion on the Thestick voters without commenting on the original case against Thestick. He also fished for an Uberfish wagon later, as TT points out.
I have to run.