Gaspar Wrote:Azza basically walks into the thread and then gets berated by Catwalk, as has gone on for days now. I probably wouldn't be even making the effort he is in that instance.I'm not berating him. Tell me what's wrong with this sequence of posts:
I'm curious to see what, if any, movement occurs given our current set of candidates.
2524: I respond to someone asking why I want to lynch Azza since he has left a very small trail, arguing that I feel the case against him is strong (minimal information trail which seems deliberate, minimal interest from others in pursuing him without making any real arguments)
2525: Azza magically appears to defend himself again, ridiculing me
2526: I accuse him of selective reading, as he chose to ignore half my post
2527: He "apologizes" for not devoting his life to responding to fabricated accusations
2528: He whines that he's being accused for being inexperienced, and says it's really important that we don't mislynch today and because he's not scum we really shouldn't lynch him
2529: I tell him it's nothing to do with experience, and point out that he's been very inconsistent in his explanations of why he's not really contributing
2530: He argues that it's pro-town to stay quiet when you don't have much to add and don't feel confident because of inexperience
2531: I argue that he's not going to get more experienced if he doesn't jump into it, and that sitting quiet is anti-town. I stress the point about his inconsistent explanations for not contributing.
Then cross reference with him calling me anti-town D2 and D3 without explaining why, other than defending thestick. Is it impolite to point out that not really talking is strongly anti-town? Only reason I'm not pushing more for him is that (as has correctly been pointed out), we will get just about no information from it whether he's guilty or innocent.