Fair enough about the language. Sorry about that. But if you believe my claim than saying the meta is ambivalent about my alignment is just not true. We've seen quite a few already and given that the game was supposed to be designed to have a number of vanilla villagers and wolves, and it's Day 6 already, I don't think we're going to see many more. So far, with the exception of Qg and I's role, all have been passive in nature. My role's only purpose as a wolf would be to hunt Qg.
Put yourself in my shoes. I have people suspecting me each night, and I quietly bite me tongue hoping that the wolves will find me scummy enough to live one more night to hopefully catch a break, and then wake up to a wagon with arguments like, "why haven't the wolves killed him yet?" "let's balance the votes", and "I believe his claim but the meta means precisely nothing."
Catwalk Wrote:Personally, I think taking offense (over nothing) makes you look like scum trying to take outrage.
Put yourself in my shoes. I have people suspecting me each night, and I quietly bite me tongue hoping that the wolves will find me scummy enough to live one more night to hopefully catch a break, and then wake up to a wagon with arguments like, "why haven't the wolves killed him yet?" "let's balance the votes", and "I believe his claim but the meta means precisely nothing."