Catwalk Wrote:Yet in your suspect list in the same post is 3rd from the bottom based on post scumminess alone. I will have to reread, but I recall you saying several time that Azza read villager to you. Lo and behold, in your next post you've found reasons to bump Azza up to 5th place.
See, I knew you were going to jump on that inconsistency and I posted the list anyway. It was other suspects bubbling towards villager that dragged Azza down on that list, not anything Azza did.
And yes I adjusted my list in the next post based on further evidence gathering. So what, if I may ask? Is that scummy now?
Catwalk Wrote:Lastly, saying that you "wanted to test the judgement of current Azza voters" seems strange to me. I assume you're referring to your last vote here. How is this a test of judgement? Either he's guilty or not, and we're guessing regardless. You can test people's reactions by switching votes, I don't see how it makes sense to argue that you're testing their judgement.
I wasn't looking for vote switches then, I wanted to test the judgement of the people who had been pushing Azza all day by seeing Azza flip.
I have to run.