I want to stress one point: Why did you start a bandwagon on Tasunke (who had zero votes) with 7 minutes to spare (passing on Selrahc and Azza, both alternatives if you wanted to save Meiz) then decide a few minutes later that Azza was a better choice than Tasunke? Did you suddenly start doubting your own judgement, which had led to defending Azza for days? I don't understand this supposed test you wanted to make.
It'd make more sense to me to either go for Selrahc or Azza right away. You were ultimately willing to vote Azza at deadline when other options were available, so you can't have been terribly convinced of Azza's innocence when Ichabod voted Tasunke. It was not a vote out of necessity. You could also have stuck with Selrahc. He was actually in the lead when the Tasunke bandwagon started, and I'd stated that I'd move to Selrahc if necessary to save Meiz. Both of those gave an opportunity to consolidate votes (or Meiz, whom we both felt was a bad lynch). You chose the 4th option to start a new bandwagon instead. I still don't think it makes sense.
It'd make more sense to me to either go for Selrahc or Azza right away. You were ultimately willing to vote Azza at deadline when other options were available, so you can't have been terribly convinced of Azza's innocence when Ichabod voted Tasunke. It was not a vote out of necessity. You could also have stuck with Selrahc. He was actually in the lead when the Tasunke bandwagon started, and I'd stated that I'd move to Selrahc if necessary to save Meiz. Both of those gave an opportunity to consolidate votes (or Meiz, whom we both felt was a bad lynch). You chose the 4th option to start a new bandwagon instead. I still don't think it makes sense.