(October 14th, 2012, 03:39)novice Wrote: [quote='novice' pid='300546' dateline='1350202479']
Gaspar - The unkind description here is "superficially useful, essentially useless".
Gaspar has been quick to credit me and Zak for village progress, trying to stay on my good side? And he has been defending villagers more than attacking scum.
Gaspar, then.
I don't really think this is accurate. I generally don't trust either of you but zak's day one play was stone cold village and anyone could see that. He died immediately after so there was no reason to doubt that. I've always kept your wolf-skill in mind, but I can't imagine scum getting in front of as much as you have - that's the only reason I've stayed away from contention with you.
Re: defending vs attacking - I don't really think that's useful either. I've tried to hunt when I've had time, when I haven't I've voiced village reads. That's something I generally do less of, since I think its less useful but when you're time limited you give what you have. That's what I've had. When I've had time, I've laid out cases but I haven't crusaded because I haven't been in a position to do so.
I agree with your read on Pindicator, except that when I ran my re-read the other day he had the most scummy behavior I read, followed by Ichabod, though both had town moments. I had intended to follow that up with more reads of those two from other days, but the forum fiasco sort of took whatever interest I had left in this game and sucked the wind out of it and I've not really bothered. This doesn't change the fact that lynching me would be a mistake and I'd prefer to win. I'm not terribly opposed to an Ichabod lynch for the same reasons, but it does seem too clean. Pindicator could be this games version of Brick for the last game, where we stop suspecting him based solely on the fact that if he was scum, how would have have wriggled off the hook so many times? So I'll go with pindicator.