(April 28th, 2013, 02:01)Serdoa Wrote: Well, I agree with zak. I really love to play with everyone on RB, but please, think first about if you have time before you sign up, at least for those small games. With 15-20 players that is much less hurtful if you can't make it (and also accepted because those are so long that everyone will have a day with less activity).
Anyhow, I don't think the decision to lynch Ryan was the wrong one - nor was it the "low-hanging fruit". It simply was the logical thing to do in the situation. A situation without any leads. The exact same posts I read now would also be written if we had lynched Bigger or uberfish, if they are village. And if we had lynched a wolf, some players would now celebrate themselves, despite it still being just a lucky coincidence (and that from me, who would have thought...).
Also, this lynch doesn't make much difference. I assume we will go down to a 3-2 or 2-1 endgame anyhow. In both cases that means we will have expended our two mislynches. And it is in both cases a 50% chance for the villagers to hit the wolves (you'll not vote for yourself, so the decision is either 2-2 or 1-1 for you).
agreed.
Honestly, I would like to hear the uberfish voters explain their votes. I think uber is making a great deal of sense and doesnt come across any scummier than he does every single game he plays (i.e., baseline). I also didn't see a reason for any of the votes - why the late bandwagon?
I think the uber voters look dirtier than the Ryan voters. Ryan was the right lynch, considering the information we had.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.