Well, if you're innocent I guess I can see why you think my case is crappy. It's certainly not a meta case, though. But now I'm the one splitting hairs. (I just realized what a delightfully rewarding activity that is - the target practice is excellent.)
You could be scum with Gaspar, or you could be scum with Mattimeo. Just because they can't both be true, doesn't mean I won't consider both options.
And don't start with the tunnel vision.
You could be scum with Gaspar, or you could be scum with Mattimeo. Just because they can't both be true, doesn't mean I won't consider both options.
And don't start with the tunnel vision.
If you know what I mean.