(April 29th, 2013, 20:31)Bigger Wrote: PB - sorry for not quoting, but thats a long message
1. What is the "obvious reason" for not including yourself? sorry if that seems dense, but please answer.
Obvious answer is that he clears himself via his role pm. Fairly common for players not to include themselves in analysis. I don't necessary agree, but its fairly common.
(April 29th, 2013, 20:31)Bigger Wrote: your formula's.. good grief.. you seem to completely overlook the possibility that ryan AND uber are innocent, and the wolves didn't really care who was lynched?
Not arguing this for PB, he can defend himself. But I think you raise an interesting point, I'll let PB answer before I share my thoughts.
(April 29th, 2013, 18:26)Lewwyn Wrote: Gaspar just said a lot, but also said nothing. I was actually starting to lean towards him as villager, but I was wrong as always.why would you not call out pocketbeetle for doing the same thing? Even moreso than gaspar. Why are you so fixated on the uber/Gaspar drama? are their no other candidates?
I also don't particularly like your defense from uber's accusations (if you didn't like Ryan's posts, why were you trying to lynch someone else to save him?), so lewwyn.
[/quote]
I can't believe this just happened.
In all seriousness, I'd put Lewwyn a strong second choice to uber right now. I think his play has been a little more erratic than normal even. Zak's pulling off uber for no particular reason and then coming after me actually rings town for me. I think scum zak would be happier with the presumably easier lynch (not that uber is easier to hang than me, more that it was the way the wind was blowing.)
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?