(May 1st, 2013, 17:30)zakalwe Wrote: You are an unlikely target, Uberfish. The last scum would need two more mislynches - it's hard to imagine that he wouldn't keep you around with the amount of heat you were catching. I don't think a deliberate no kill is likely, either.
Well, I can tell you that if I'm scum in anyone's position here, some moron claims "I blocked Uberfish" 6 minutes before the deadline, and I see it, I'm switching my order to no kill without a second thought. It's not exactly rocket science when it's still 2 mislynches for a scum win.
On to day 2.
Expected bandwagon on me materializes. Bigger initially attacks PB for not justifying his votes (a really weak attack - PB did post some short reasoning for voting me on day 1). When he does get more material (in post 118) his behaviour is rather odd. He does have some more justification for continuing to vote PB here but in the same post moves off to Lewwyn. Only late in the day, when gaspar is in the lead with 3 votes, does he move to Gaspar claiming his Lewwyn vote was a reaction test to see if Gaspar would switch or some nonsense like that. This is post #142 and it reads as if Bigger actually wants to claim some credit here for a Gaspar lynch if it happens by making an original contribution with this "gambit".
Gaspar also moves to Bigger at this time. (Note this is after attempts to bandwagon other targets have been exhausted.) If gaspar is scum, this is the ideal time to switch to bussing if Gaspar is going to be lynched as things stand anyway.
PB declares intent to switch to bigger and so Matt effectively casts what would look to him as the deciding vote here by switchig Gaspar -> Bigger. Another hint towards Matt's innocence. He's not under fire and doesn't need to suddenly pull a bus out of nowhere.