Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
[Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here

(July 22nd, 2013, 17:28)Fintourist Wrote: I've been "working" a while with Mining->BW->Fishing stuff. Here is one of the variations, where settler comes eot36:

Details spoilered if you want to try:

  • Worker (0-14)
  • Warrior (15-23)
  • Worker (24-28) Do not change to worker before the mine finishes, this way worker finishes when chop comes in with 60/60 hammers
  • Finish Warrior by working a mine (T29)
  • Start settler (T30)
  • Start WB, but do not grow by working a mine (T31)
  • Switch to settler and get 2 chops into it (T32)
  • Whip WB (T33)
  • Finish Settler with two chops (T34-36)
  • WB
  • Warrior


This gets a faster growth curve than the one that I posted last time, but is a bit behind in hammers and has two forests less. Probably still worth it though.

I've stuck this in the spreadsheet as "FT M->BW->Fish" - did I get it right? I also made a copy where we work a plains forest from t21-23 to get the warrior out six turns earlier, but it doesn't have the nice touch with the growth threshold whip so comes out two food ahead but 8 hammers behind. Is six extra turns of warrior-scouting going to be more useful to us than 6 foodhammers?

I've added another variant of M-F-BW that gets the settler t36, but it's way behind your M-BW-F on other stuff, so I'm happy to go with M-BW-F unless you can come up with something even more efficient...
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Old Harry - July 25th, 2013, 08:52
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - December 19th, 2013, 10:19
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - April 12th, 2014, 12:30

Forum Jump: