(August 13th, 2013, 04:34)Fintourist Wrote: And that #4 is terrible

(August 13th, 2013, 04:34)Fintourist Wrote: One random micro note:EDIT: I expect that it's easier to fit the chops of forests S-SW and S-S from our capital later in our microplan as they are closer to #3a/b
- In my earlier 2-worker sims I found it useful to chop first the forest SE of the capital, and thus move our worker NE-SE next (T29). That way our 2 workers can chop the forests W-W and W-SW (from our capital) at around ~T37 and be in position to support our 2nd city more comfortably
EDIT2: What were your plans on next worker movements?
I was thinking:
Worker A chops forest W,W of cap, then roads W,SW then chops, then builds a mine
Worker B chops forest S,S of cap, then helps with W,SW and builds the road to our second city
But I can see the argument for chopping SE of cap. Chopping WW means the settler doesn't need the road to settle city 2 - how do you feel about not linking the cities?
Also I like the mine for capping production in Agincourt and sharing between three cities, but getting more chops in instead might be more useful at this point - should we aim to be completely deforested before building any mines?
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
In progress: Rimworld