Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
[Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here

(August 13th, 2013, 04:34)Fintourist Wrote: And that #4 is terrible lol

smoke Yeah, I wasn't suggesting settling them in numerical order! But we'll want to fill that gap at some point to make a pretty border...

(August 13th, 2013, 04:34)Fintourist Wrote: One random micro note:
  • In my earlier 2-worker sims I found it useful to chop first the forest SE of the capital, and thus move our worker NE-SE next (T29). That way our 2 workers can chop the forests W-W and W-SW (from our capital) at around ~T37 and be in position to support our 2nd city more comfortably
EDIT: I expect that it's easier to fit the chops of forests S-SW and S-S from our capital later in our microplan as they are closer to #3a/b
EDIT2: What were your plans on next worker movements?

I was thinking:
Worker A chops forest W,W of cap, then roads W,SW then chops, then builds a mine
Worker B chops forest S,S of cap, then helps with W,SW and builds the road to our second city

But I can see the argument for chopping SE of cap. Chopping WW means the settler doesn't need the road to settle city 2 - how do you feel about not linking the cities?

Also I like the mine for capping production in Agincourt and sharing between three cities, but getting more chops in instead might be more useful at this point - should we aim to be completely deforested before building any mines?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Old Harry - August 13th, 2013, 07:59
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - December 19th, 2013, 10:19
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - April 12th, 2014, 12:30

Forum Jump: