Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
[Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here

(October 11th, 2013, 16:09)TheHumanHydra Wrote: Tell that to me in 45 ... tongue

tongue I think your gamble worked perfectly for the first 140 turns and nobody punished you from having more or less only warriors. You just forgot to tell your replacement that now it's the time to build units! mischief

(October 12th, 2013, 06:23)Old Harry Wrote: Sandbox for t89 (ie after this turn rolls).

bow

Quote:Another suggested slight change to the worker micro - t90 worker G moves NW and starts a road, t91 he finishes the road t92 he gets on the galley. This means we only have two workers to improve the sugar once calender comes in. Currency comes in eot94 and Calender eot99 at the moment.

I haven't checked this yet, but based on my past micro runs I agree with this!

(October 12th, 2013, 12:43)Old Harry Wrote: Aaaand Plako scores the Great Lighthouse.

Yeah, it would have been better if it had been someone else. Let's hope that his neighbors can at least punish him a bit through faster expansion.

Quote:YossarianLives and the workboat reveal a bit more land. With another seafood resource that peninsula could be good for a city. I think we have time for the workboat to scout around to dtay's border before he needs to get back to the whale.

That penisula looks really interesting. It seems possible that dtay does not have a land connection to the area. If our WB does not reveal more food resources settling our 11th-15th city NW of clams could be an option

Quote:So far so good on the Hastings plan, we have an axe and two bowmen with a third finishing this turn along with the settler.

Fingers still crossed! please If we manage to settle and hold Hastings and City J as planned our expansion to east must be considered as a success.

Quote:I've set Cannae to a bowman for growth, although another worker would be handy. At what point do we want to think about building a lighthouse? It's only likely to get us one extra food per turn, so perhaps never?

Yeah, I guess we will still need a couple of bowmen so those hammers won't be wasted. Re lighthouse: Maybe that should be calculated.. +1 food surplus has always value and eventually we might work some coast as well, but because the initial investment is 60 hammers, the payback seems to come pretty late.. IIRC Cannae needs to stagnate for 3 turns as it waits for whale + sugar to come online. We might want to consider putting a turn or 2 into a worker and double-whipping it. Although, we kind of want to work as many cottages as possible in Cannae so whipping is painful..

(October 13th, 2013, 02:50)Old Harry Wrote: Logged in to end turn and noticed Ichabod has met us with a work boat south of France... I left our EPs on slow, but I think Ichy is going to be a longer-term threat:

Yeah, Ichabod is definitely doing very well when we take into account that he already lost a city and seems to have a conflict with slowcheetah as well. It would be interesting to see what kind of land he has to play with. But yeah, I'm fine with getting slow's graphs first and then Ichabod's

Quote:WilliamLP is near Ichabandit as well as Pindicooter.

Interesting. I think William LP should be located either W, SW or S of Ichabod. We might be even neighbors. You think Pindicooter's are there because of that earlier city raze civstats info? You are surely right, but IIRC there was also another option, but I can't remember who it was anymore.

I've been thinking about circumnavigation lately. We are surely not getting it via scouting, but with well timed map trades we might have a small chance of getting a 50-50 shot at it.That would of course be huge. If we would need to make move immediately, trading maps with Ichabod and Yurimack would be my best bet. However, we will probably only get a one chance for trying this and I don't think that we are that far yet. Maybe in 10 turns.. mischief
Finished:
PBEM 45G, PB 13, PB 18, PB 38 & PB 49

Top 3 favorite turns: 
#1, #2, #3
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Fintourist - October 13th, 2013, 09:31
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - December 19th, 2013, 10:19
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - April 12th, 2014, 12:30

Forum Jump: