Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
[Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here

Hmm.. What if suttree moves his stack onto city ruins and blocks our route to Jamestown? If we move our axe W of Hastings we will only have 1 axe to hit suttree's stack and rest of our units won't have odds against his 2 remaining axes (or chariot). I like the idea of us being able to kill both of those chariots immediately, but I don't want to encourage him to any forking activities. If he does that anyway I think we want to have both of our axes in range..

Ok, I vote against moving the axe W of Hasting for aforementioned reasons. We must be able to deal with those chariots without him

I did not completely catch what was your idea of unit compositions on the jungle tile and in Jamestown. Also because of the aforementioned forking scenario I would like to have 2 bowmen in Jamestown. Btw, this would be a good turn to put 1-turn worth of production into bowman in Hastings. Just that we have the ability to whip one if required. The stupid turn order destroys our ability to do any emergency whips unless we are already prepared.

Edit: I think we need to run the slider at least at ~20 % so that our beaker generation will be enough for completing the calendar next turn. Probably something like 50 % could be solid. It's not the end of the world if Cannae does not work e.g. the gold tile despite the 50 % slider..
Finished:
PBEM 45G, PB 13, PB 18, PB 38 & PB 49

Top 3 favorite turns: 
#1, #2, #3
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Fintourist - October 22nd, 2013, 03:29
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - December 19th, 2013, 10:19
RE: [Spoilers] Fintourist and Old Harry have nothing to see here - by Bobchillingworth - April 12th, 2014, 12:30

Forum Jump: