It's weird that I'm having so much trouble keeping track of our competitors--some of it's probably that we're referring to some teams by team name and some by civ and that I can't keep track of the correlation, and some of it's likely that there were 4 possible colors that could have matched Rome (the 3 purples, as well as that dark green that's TeddyKGB on the scoreboard (which I mistook for Rome while not knowing any better
)
So basically Rome is trying to play kingmaker by over-committing on military? How is their GNP--how much conquest could they reasonably support (without stopping research completely and/or losing their military to strike)?
How good is BowAivo's land? How are they so far behind the leaders, but at tech parity? What is the next military tech we could get to push BowAivo in our favor (and when could we get it/would we get it assuming the econ plan)?

So basically Rome is trying to play kingmaker by over-committing on military? How is their GNP--how much conquest could they reasonably support (without stopping research completely and/or losing their military to strike)?
How good is BowAivo's land? How are they so far behind the leaders, but at tech parity? What is the next military tech we could get to push BowAivo in our favor (and when could we get it/would we get it assuming the econ plan)?