Suttree... That is so f***ing low. 
You have already ruined our game, there is no need to gift your cities to mackoti.
What a joke. That is simply wrong, not only for us, but for anybody trying to compete in this game. If scoopin knew what happened they would be full of rage.
How about we select mackoti+suttree as our enemy and return the favor by gradually gifting our cities to dtay and Ichabod?
Really, all these actions from Nakor, M_H and Suttree have simply killed the game, at least for me. Oh well, I guess it's just our duty to fight mackoti for the next 50 turns until we know whether it's scoopin or mackoti, who manages to stay more intact, and then this hopefully ends. But does it really make any sense to play this out either when everything just depends on who gets the most gifts from neighbours?
As a clarification for possibly confused lurkers: Technically suttree bought peace from mackoti by gifting Barcelona (which we can't attack due to our enforced peace with mack), so it would be a mess if we would ask for a reload or anything. It's just pretty questionable, because mack would not have captured the city without losses, we also had ~20 knights next to the city and now we can't take it. In practice, suttree has simply selected his side and is a vassal of mackoti and tries to hurt us as much as possible and apparently gifting a city with walls and several longbows in it is something he prefers to do. Sigh. What a farce.
You have already ruined our game, there is no need to gift your cities to mackoti.What a joke. That is simply wrong, not only for us, but for anybody trying to compete in this game. If scoopin knew what happened they would be full of rage.
How about we select mackoti+suttree as our enemy and return the favor by gradually gifting our cities to dtay and Ichabod?
Really, all these actions from Nakor, M_H and Suttree have simply killed the game, at least for me.
Oh well, I guess it's just our duty to fight mackoti for the next 50 turns until we know whether it's scoopin or mackoti, who manages to stay more intact, and then this hopefully ends. But does it really make any sense to play this out either when everything just depends on who gets the most gifts from neighbours?As a clarification for possibly confused lurkers: Technically suttree bought peace from mackoti by gifting Barcelona (which we can't attack due to our enforced peace with mack), so it would be a mess if we would ask for a reload or anything. It's just pretty questionable, because mack would not have captured the city without losses, we also had ~20 knights next to the city and now we can't take it. In practice, suttree has simply selected his side and is a vassal of mackoti and tries to hurt us as much as possible and apparently gifting a city with walls and several longbows in it is something he prefers to do. Sigh. What a farce.