I postponed the decision..
Next turn we'll start completing units, Theocracy or not. And I don't want to delay civic decision further, because if we switch back to OR in 5 turns then we are again 5 turns locked out of Nationhood/Slavery and it's nice to have civic flexibility when our peace with mack again runs out. He accepted OP so that makes me feel a bit better that we won't be attacked in 10 turns.
I kind of decided yesterday evening that we revolt into Theocracy already because we want to send a message to hungry opponents out there ("we don't taste good"). But when I looked at those OR hammers this turn...
Anyways, next turn is still a good time to revolt into Theo and I'm trying to convince myself into doing it :P
In other news, two Ichabod's coastal cities that we are blockading have lost 2 pop points each and the other one will continue to do so..
We keep doing so at least for couple of turns so that if we manage to get a peace deal with Ichabod it's nicely apart from our deal with mack. These diplo messages gave me a further idea: Should we send iron-for-iron kind of things to WilliamLP now that we are technically still in war with Ichabod? It would be pretty sneaky, because we are not planning to do any real warring, but wouldn't it be awesome if William would do the heavy lifting and kill Ichabod's knights & cats? On the other hand, the thought does not please me that WilliamLP turns into an easy pick for plako, but I guess in our position we should not really care that much who of the leaders has it the easiest (but I still care!).

I kind of decided yesterday evening that we revolt into Theocracy already because we want to send a message to hungry opponents out there ("we don't taste good"). But when I looked at those OR hammers this turn...

In other news, two Ichabod's coastal cities that we are blockading have lost 2 pop points each and the other one will continue to do so..
