Thanks for all the comments.
Surely if all the players realised that the map gave an advantage to LP, why did they all sign up for such long and continuous NAPs with LP allowing him to benefit from the perfect storm identified? Surely they have contributed to their own demise, if indeed their demise is the end result.
If a map is so-called unbalanced it is surely the challenge of dealing with what you have been dealt that is the key issue. Different geographical circumstances will lead to different geopolitical outcomes. The donut in PB2 was extremely well balanced, but to my mind this is somewhat more interesting because of the differing outcomes all over the place.
I suppose he was the smartest player realising how the game was likely to pan out based initially on his reading of his geography. LP wasn't to know he had an advantage or not. Plus, doesn't he have only one far flung source of iron? Doesn't seem like much of an advantage to me. He settled aggressively quite early on in his south, creating the in-fill potential; he manipulated the other players to keep on signing NAPs. Looking at the graphs posted in the last game turn it would appear to have been clear from around 500AD that he was pulling away and that would have been the time to slow him down by not signing those NAPs which allowed him to luxuriate with minimal military.
The dog-pile seems like a suitable reaction to him 'running away with it' but as far as I recall only 1 team involved in that has a stated plan to win, through a possible culture victory. The rest just seem focused on making sure LP doesn't win - fine but ultimately boring. Given the game situation the dog-pile would make sense - the challenge being balancing one's contributions to that with the other eye on winning the game in your own way. Surely, this is the whole point of the game and not, as some appear to be getting close to, just seemingly giving up....
It is the decisions around this challenge which seem most interesting, and hopefully this game is far from over. As someone just observed, how will LP actually win? If he gets dog-piled he will surely be setback for a while at least, allowing the smarter other players to take advantage and go for their own win.
I hope all is not lost simply because of the difficult challenge of this stage of the game. To win you have to work for it, surely?
Surely if all the players realised that the map gave an advantage to LP, why did they all sign up for such long and continuous NAPs with LP allowing him to benefit from the perfect storm identified? Surely they have contributed to their own demise, if indeed their demise is the end result.
If a map is so-called unbalanced it is surely the challenge of dealing with what you have been dealt that is the key issue. Different geographical circumstances will lead to different geopolitical outcomes. The donut in PB2 was extremely well balanced, but to my mind this is somewhat more interesting because of the differing outcomes all over the place.
I suppose he was the smartest player realising how the game was likely to pan out based initially on his reading of his geography. LP wasn't to know he had an advantage or not. Plus, doesn't he have only one far flung source of iron? Doesn't seem like much of an advantage to me. He settled aggressively quite early on in his south, creating the in-fill potential; he manipulated the other players to keep on signing NAPs. Looking at the graphs posted in the last game turn it would appear to have been clear from around 500AD that he was pulling away and that would have been the time to slow him down by not signing those NAPs which allowed him to luxuriate with minimal military.
The dog-pile seems like a suitable reaction to him 'running away with it' but as far as I recall only 1 team involved in that has a stated plan to win, through a possible culture victory. The rest just seem focused on making sure LP doesn't win - fine but ultimately boring. Given the game situation the dog-pile would make sense - the challenge being balancing one's contributions to that with the other eye on winning the game in your own way. Surely, this is the whole point of the game and not, as some appear to be getting close to, just seemingly giving up....
It is the decisions around this challenge which seem most interesting, and hopefully this game is far from over. As someone just observed, how will LP actually win? If he gets dog-piled he will surely be setback for a while at least, allowing the smarter other players to take advantage and go for their own win.
I hope all is not lost simply because of the difficult challenge of this stage of the game. To win you have to work for it, surely?