Sareln Wrote:Every Team has it (So no WE monopoly)Only Khmer can build WEs. See agreed pitboss settings.
|
Civ/leader pick
|
Sareln Wrote:Thank you Mist. And yes, I do believe we should go for one of our leaders now instead of Khemer. No Ivory @ Start, Every Team has it (So no WE monopoly) makes me think we should go w/ a different CIV.Khmer is still the only civ allowed to build Elephants. No other civ is allowed to build Elephants. Thus, we will have the only Elephants, assuming we make it to Construction. (Correct?)
Lord Parkin Wrote:Khmer is still the only civ allowed to build Elephants. No other civ is allowed to build Elephants. Thus, we will have the only Elephants, assuming we make it to Construction. (Correct?) Uff, almost got heart attack
Sareln Wrote:Thank you Mist. And yes, I do believe we should go for one of our leaders now instead of Khemer. No Ivory @ Start, Every Team has it (So no [STRIKE]WE monopoly[/STRIKE] happycap advantage) makes me think we should go w/ a different CIV. Lord Parkin Wrote:Here is the original post. Do we want to bank a large part of our game on that? Lord Parkin Wrote:So we can expect it to be within roughly the same radius as Copper/Iron/Horses, i.e. not an unreasonable distance away. It seems fairly clear that this is what you originally meant, so I'm satisfied. Can you confirm that Darrell's post is incorrect?I can confirm Darrell's post as uneducated guesswork bordering on playful trolling And yes, you can expect the same radius as Iron/Copper/Horse
Sareln Wrote:Do we want to bank a large part of our game on that?As much as we'd want to bank our game on having Horses as Egypt or Iron as Rome. I don't see anything to be gained from switching civs, unless Ivory will be placed at a considerably different radius than other early strategic resources. Mist Wrote:I can confirm Darrell's post as uneducated guesswork bordering on playful trollingThat's good to know, thanks Mist. Really I'm getting the feeling that it would be far easier to make all these picks with no map information. Oh well, maybe next time.
nabaxo Wrote:I say we should stick with it. Mist Wrote:I can confirm Darrell's post as uneducated guesswork bordering on playful trolling Lord Parkin Wrote:As much as we'd want to bank our game on having Horses as Egypt or Iron as Rome. I don't see anything to be gained from switching civs, unless Ivory will be placed at a considerably different radius than other early strategic resources. If it's being treated like Iron/Copper/Horses, I'm fine with rolling with it. Just figured we should hit the panic button in case that was, not the case.
|

And yes, you can expect the same radius as Iron/Copper/Horse