WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER

[Ryan]

I was trying to put my thoughts down man. I honestly thought from what I read that Novice is a good target and I wrote why. I am getting told im plagirising to up my vote count? Please write next to the game no new players allowed.

[MJW (ya that one)]

I was trying to put my thoughts down man. I honestly thought from what I read that Novice is a good target and I wrote why. I am getting told im plagirising to up my vote count? Please write next to the game no new players allowed.

I don't think post count is the correct term, now. I think "being able to dump your vote on someone" as a better way to talk about it. Also don't think your post would count as plagiarism for school. I think you read others posts and poorly reworded them. That does not count offically as plagiarism. I probably just would not have used the term if I knew you would over react with like this.

[Ryan]

So let me see this if someone writes a point that I agree with . I am unable to vote on that person and it would be me dumping my vote? Also If I state the points in my point of view its wrong aswell? I guess I am unable to say you are being over defending of Novice?

[MJW (ya that one)]

My post count comment was also really silly as I now notice Ryan is #1 in posts although they are a bit fluffy.

I hate you no editing rule. :zzz:

[Selrahc]

Sigh.. Il stop posting I guess.

Wrong attitude to have.

Getting told I am upping my post count and plagirsing Meh kinda rude no?

This is, by its very nature, an inquisitorial game. People are bound to question your motives and behaviour. The response to that which we like is to redouble your efforts to prove your point, or to adjust your point in light of what they have said. Either way adds to the game.

To instead refuse to participate is not helpful, to anybody. Probably least of all you.

Please don't take people being adversarial as them being rude. I'm sure that isn't what they were intending.

[MJW (ya that one)]

:

So let me see this if someone writes a point that I agree with . I am unable to vote on that person and it would be me dumping my vote? Also If I state the points in my point of view its wrong aswell? I guess I am unable to say you are being over defending of Novice?

I think the big problem is that your post was poor and hard to read. If you just agreed with the post you would type up a decent 'I agree' post in 2 seconds. This did not happen though. Instead, you reworded what was said before in a poor way because you did not understand what was said. You did this because you want to vote novice and jumped at it as quickly as possible.

Or it could be just a bad post. I would expect some of the same terms of what others said to creep into your post if you were rewording and not stating what you think. I'll look at it closer, now .

[Ryan]

If we lynch Novice. If he has the item then it will be gone correct? Isnt that better for the item to be gone? I dont think it has any use for town.

If we lynch Novice. If he has the item then it will be gone correct? Isnt that better for the item to be gone? I dont think it has any use for town.

Correct on all 3 points.

Im trying to figure out what point would it be to have that as town. If its gone the seer can find people very easily unless.. the seer item is with the scum can that work?

Edit: Seer item is useless for Scum either way.

Im trying to figure out what point would it be to have that as town. If its gone the seer can find people very easily unless.. the seer item is with the scum can that work?

Edit: Seer item is useless for Scum either way.

Scum can't use it (and it makes little sense to do it) and for now at the start of the game we are promised by BRick that a villager has the board.

Then, Since the town has the board we should lynch Novice tbh. I dont see a point in claiming you have the card since Town doesnt need it. It is an item wanted by the scum so he is giving them easy access to it. if hes town and they have the pick pocket item. Im guessing he is the scum. Novice

I dont see my self wording what people said differently and this is here what I wrote and discussed it with Rowain But ur overdefending Novice anywayz

[MJW (ya that one)]

If we lynch Novice. If he has the item then it will be gone correct? Isnt that better for the item to be gone? I dont think it has any use for town.

If we lynch Novice. If he has the item then it will be gone correct? Isnt that better for the item to be gone? I dont think it has any use for town.

Correct on all 3 points.

Im trying to figure out what point would it be to have that as town. If its gone the seer can find people very easily unless.. the seer item is with the scum can that work?

Edit: Seer item is useless for Scum either way.

Im trying to figure out what point would it be to have that as town. If its gone the seer can find people very easily unless.. the seer item is with the scum can that work?

Edit: Seer item is useless for Scum either way.

Scum can't use it (and it makes little sense to do it) and for now at the start of the game we are promised by BRick that a villager has the board.

Then, Since the town has the board we should lynch Novice tbh. I dont see a point in claiming you have the card since Town doesnt need it. It is an item wanted by the scum so he is giving them easy access to it. if hes town and they have the pick pocket item. Im guessing he is the scum. Novice

I dont see my self wording what people said differently and this is here what I wrote and discussed it with Rowain But ur overdefending Novice anywayz

I'm not sure if I believe you. I'm too lazy to look at the text of post #123 aggersively. And compare it to what you+rowain said earlier; to see who said what first and the exact wording. Mainly because even if you copyied Rowain, Tasunke would still be my #1 target. Villagers can fall into the trap of wanting to dump their vote on someone to; so even if I'm right it only hints that you are scum.

[Ryan]

I am having trouble quoting so here :


MJW : "I'm not sure if I believe you. I'm too lazy to look at the text of post #123 aggersively. And compare it to what you+rowain said earlier; to see who said what first and the exact wording. Mainly because even if you copyied Rowain, Tasunke would still be my #1 target. Villagers can fall into the trap of wanting to dump their vote on someone to; so even if I'm right it only hints that you are scum."

You are increasing as scum in my eyes man. You are claiming I copied my words yet right now its as if you didnt even read it. Again why are you blatantly defending novice this much. Changed the topic from about him towards me copying text and posted crap about plagirisim. Seems like a wolf defending his brother or trying to change topic.

[Ryan]

From what I understood, Your saying you have the tarrot card. I am guessing that If you claimed to have that card you are scum since:
1- You are an easy pickpocket target for the *wolves*
2- You have an excuse if the seer sees that your a wolf.
3- You are claiming be to trustworthy.
4- We will be wasting the jail on you incase you are not.

Killing you has so many benefits from removing that item from the game to killing a likely scum. I dont see a better 1st day lynch.

Aren't #1 and #2 contradictory? If he is fake-claiming then the only safe way to do that is if another scum holds the fool card. But if another scum holds the fool card then it doesnt really matter if scum has the pickpocket item or not.

Or is this more along rowain's line of arguing that we should lynch novice just as the least risky option? If you want to play not to lose, that usually is how you lose (for example, how my school botched a 10-point lead in the 4th quarter of the Alamo Bowl).

I guess I don't follow why it is a big deal that novice claimed fool. As a villager it is the right thing to do. As wolf it is a risky play. But claiming shouldnt clear him one way or the other. I find others' reactions more interesting, although i find it too early to draw conclusions. JusBut this is good info to file away for later

I am trying to state several reasons why Novice is doing this. I should have added if he was... then he would do ...

Thing is All I am looking at is a Risk lynch On tasunke that has no garantees to give us anything. A lynch on Novice would remove an item from play and Its equal in rish with Lynching Tasunke. MJW is also giving me the snitch feeling the way he changed topic .