Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
vote tally:
Zakalwe(2): Bigger, Scooter
Scooter(2): Zakalwe, Uberfish
Bigger(1): BrickAstley
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Posts: 7,916
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2012
scooter Wrote:ever notice how he never is the first serious vote on somebody?
Problem is, that while that play does match his, it would make more sense for the assassin to be talking AND to be making the first serious vote; if he is followed, then he gets a guard killed. If he is not, then he knows the king. Bam, assassin wins.
I know i've been first vote or close to it every day, but that's been mostly my Bigger crusade, and I know I'm a guard. However, there's someone else who seems ready to always get his vote wedged in early.
Scooter
Posts: 15,376
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
BRickAstley Wrote:Problem is, that while that play does match his, it would make more sense for the assassin to be talking AND to be making the first serious vote; if he is followed, then he gets a guard killed. If he is not, then he knows the king. Bam, assassin wins.
First of all, that's just not true. Second, that sounds an awful lot like the way you've been playing actually. Are you trying to get us to vote for you?
BRickAstley Wrote:However, there's someone else who seems ready to always get his vote wedged in early.
I can't figure out what this sentence means.
Posts: 7,916
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2012
scooter Wrote:First of all, that's just not true. Second, that sounds an awful lot like the way you've been playing actually. Are you trying to get us to vote for you?
I love how you say that while not quoting the part of my post where I acknowledge and explain that. 
But why would you say that's not true? An assassin that leads a voting bloc has lots of power and a much higher chance of winning, I don't see how you have a problem with that.
Quote:I can't figure out what this sentence means.
Sorry, I can be unclear. What I mean is, you always get your vote in early as well, and since I think that's a winning assassin strategy, I suspect you.
And I know I do it some too, but I'm a guard, and if the current playing wisdom is that the assassin is cautious with their votes, and if I was the assassin, why would I try to challenge the current assassin tell to one that might target me too? If I were the assassin, I would keep trying to influence the vote while pointing fingers on those who jump on late. And who is doing just that? You are.
ergo, interfectorem est scooter
Posts: 15,376
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
BRickAstley Wrote:I love how you say that while not quoting the part of my post where I acknowledge and explain that.
I saw it, but that wasn't an explanation, it was just a stating of what you've been doing. You said "it's because of the Bigger crusade and the fact that I'm a guard." I don't think that is an even remotely satisfying explanation.
BRickAstley Wrote:But why would you say that's not true? An assassin that leads a voting bloc has lots of power and a much higher chance of winning, I don't see how you have a problem with that.
The longer an assassin survives, the higher his odds are of winning. Also, you are assuming people would jump on with the assassin, which is a big assumption. You can't be sure. If people ignore the first vote, that doesn't necessarily mean the assassin has caught the king. Let's say assassin votes for X right away. X is not the king. People think the assassin is supicious and the lynch him. An assassin conclusion that "X = king" is not a concrete conclusion, and in this case loses him the game. Not a smart move for an assassin.
Interesting that you accuse me of "getting my vote in early" when Bigger actually voted Zakalwe before me, and he's the one you're crusading on. So you're saying you're voting for me because I'm doing X, when in reality I'm doing the opposite and the guy you've been targetting all game (Bigger) is actually the one doing X. I'm really confused by what you're saying/doing right now, it's really inconsistent.
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 15,376
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
tally:
Zakalwe(2): Bigger, scooter
scooter(2): Zakalwe, Brick
Brick(1): uberfish
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
Wow no reaction at all?
Scooter
Posts: 15,376
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
uberfish Wrote:Wow no reaction at all?
Scooter
I was waiting for Brick's reaction to my last post. I decided I was going to give him til 3 and then I'd flip onto him.
Posts: 15,376
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Basically, I got what I wanted out of my Zak post. I got a very scummy reaction from Brick. But fine, I'll quit waiting and vote for him now as planned. Brick
|
