WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[pindicator]

So if he jumps off, you'll have more evidence.

Until then Meiz, what do you think about what's been brought up about Qgqqqqq?

[novice]

I'm open to a Waterbat lynch as well, would like to hear Lewwyn's case.

[novice]

I'm open to a Waterbat lynch as well, would like to hear Lewwyn's case.

But I'm still tempted to just lynch Mattimeo straight away - his protection choices coupled with the wolves audacity in choice of night kills stinks.

[Catwalk]

I'm a little concerned that Mattimeo may have made a true claim, but as scum. There is usually some kind of vig role in the town, and it protects from scrying abilities and role blocking as well. The problem with this is that Injera can verify he is indeed a cloaker, which doesn't necessarily prove his innocence. Injera, why did you pick those targets? Your ability would be highly useful as scum to fish for power roles.

[Meiz]

So if he jumps off, you'll have more evidence.

Well, it's a bit moot since I've already made my case against him.

Until then Meiz, what do you think about what's been brought up about Qgqqqqq?

Generally, his messages are pain for the eyes and I'm not sure if that's how he is, or if he is doing it on purpose. I don't remember him being this unclear.

When thestick is at 4 votes, Qgqq votes Tasunke (no one's voting for him anymore). Why not go for example agaisnt Sareln or Bigger, who had more votes? I think at this point wolves still tried to direct attention away from thestick. Well, I guess this could be called as directing attention elsewhere, but for example vote against Sareln wouldn't need much reasons behind it. Later votes uber (again first vote) and keeps his vote there until the end.

More importantly, I find Selrahc more suspicious and he goes after Qgqq :D

[Meiz]

i voted icha, to make it count because he was on my "list" and other candidate wasnt.

What is this list of yours?

[Rowain]

But I'm still tempted to just lynch Mattimeo straight away - his protection choices coupled with the wolves audacity in choice of night kills stinks.

We ahve a tracker who screams out what his results were. I at least expected his 'null-read' to be a trap to catch a Cloaker who claims to have done nothing. As it is I do believe that both are true or to be precise out of the various possibilites I can imagine I think thats the most likely one.

Lewwyn* and Qgqqqqq,

what about day3 when catwalk stayed in the lead until the very end when we (myself included) called for Mero to hang (and Mero subsequently claimed himself to death)?

Assuming that was the villager-led misstep it appeared to be, doesn't that make you think that catwalk is innocent? The mafia were just going to let catwalk go without a fight? Unless they came out in force in that last little Mero push, i don't see it.

Hmmm... Indeed, it may be worth it to lynch catwalk forthwith to get the information it gives. If mafioso, we certainly get some suspects in the Mero push. If villager, i think late Merovech movers get some cred there as it would seem an unnecessary risk for the mafia to move votes from villager to villager at such a late stage.


Not sure what I did to get on your scumdar, Lewwyn - but I'm sure you will let me know soon. If it is tied to the catwalk-mero thing, well, not sure what to say. I hope we hit a guilty party and if doing so makes me look incredibly bad, so be it.

catwalk

You believe that Catwalk is innocent but vote for him? Happy to lynch a villager? Your reasoning is also strange. If CW is a villager then we had 2 villagers up and scum will happily vote for whoever they can without earning looks. Which given Merovechs claim and the call to arms from both uberfish and novice means Merovech was a save spot to vote.

[Qgqqqqq]

Thats why i used "". I just meant generally he's one of the people I suspect strongly. I haven't actually made a list.

[Qgqqqqq]

Can we get a tally?

[Qgqqqqq]

A pain to read? Thats harsh
As for clarity, honestly, thats because ive been contributing more (then WW15) and, I suppose the price to pay is legibility and clarity.
And to your over point, i didnt vote sareln or bigger because i didnt think they were guilty.
That is the part i dont get, why would i vote x just b/c it had more votes then y?!?