Quick summary (sorry only really know what happened from my perspective)
We played 3v3 Small Team Battleground with the following teams (all random civs + leaders)
team 1
Claudius - Agg leader of America
Morgan - Agg leader of Inca (Kublai perhaps?)
plako - Rome, don't recall traits
team 2
Mukha - Ind leader of Mali
Twinkletoes - Ind leader of...I forgot
Dantski - Zara of Native America
Team 1 had plakos Rome SE and had Claudius SW corner and Morgan central west. Team 2 had Mukha NW corner, myself NE corner and Twinkle center east.
Early on Mukha was hoping to choke his nearest neighbour, but with that being Inca it never happened. Team 1 sent their starting warriors aggressively our way and 2 of Team 2's players felt they needed to build warriors immediately (all team 2 started with scouts).
Initially the teams were even score wise, I intended to use HA's to sneak raze a Roman city but they were diverted to defeat the small Roman stack.
After that Morgan (with I assume some help) was able to get a significant military advantage over Mukha in the west and was able to raze a city. At the sametime a detachment of my HA's narrowly failed to raze one of Inca's backline cities. Eventually Morgans stack was defeated at the gates of Mukha's capital.
Not long after, Twink's stack was annihilated by plako and with Team 1 significantly ahead in score + land, Team 2 conceded.
I feel Team 2 was always facing an uphill struggle this game since aside from Mukha, we were unable to found more than 2 cities simply due to woeful land (not one food resource outside of capital for me). Having Quecha's next to skirmishers was unlucky as well as the drawing of Rome + 2 AGG civs as Team 2's opponents.
I think everyone had fun though
