pindicator Wrote:why would novice's come in as no result?
It's pretty common GM practice to not distinguish between a no result action and a failed/blocked action.
I have to run.
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives
|
pindicator Wrote:why would novice's come in as no result? It's pretty common GM practice to not distinguish between a no result action and a failed/blocked action.
I have to run.
Qgqqqqq reactions to the claim by Injera:
Qgqqqqq Wrote:Wow this is big! Injera Wrote:Yes, I have no shot limitation and I've bugged someone every night. I will reveal all of my moves, but crucially I'd like to see what Mattimeo says first. Qgqqqqq Wrote:That feels suspicious to me injera but will give benefit of dought for now He goes for Catwalk after the claim, even though Injera just claimed the same role as he has. But, he also suspects Injera in his second post. Could go either way...
Lets try this then.
Until you answer the question. Qgqqqqq
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."
Sorry guys "Night Tracker" followed by a short description of what that means.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
@ icha, at the time i was trying to lure him into a lie/wait to track tonight and so wanted to alleviate suspicion by sticking to CW.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
So lets get the movements right we have :
Matt: Matt, Nobody, Nobody Inj: Pind, Matt, CW Qg: Matt, Novice, Inj (moved to CW) So one of Qg and Matt is lying for sure
The Qgqqqqqq files:
post 33: votes waterbat for mayor (obviously convinced by my first post) and Ichabod for lynch as a joke vote post 46: defends catwalk for stating he will be busy post 79: votes catwalk while stating that he hates to vote on an absentee post 165 (double post): thanks catwalk for explaining. votes Tasunke post 212: votes uberfish for weird arguments , but catwalk is getting suspcious again post 290: is ok with NOT voting a claimer, but not if it means thestick has to die. (pretty strong tie to wolf-stick...hmm) post 399: Quote:Wow i'm impressed!all the piles were paranoia? post 561: references post 518 (which is Novice pointing out the contradictions above) post 564,566: character limited Qgq defends his catwalk dancing in post 568, Rowain asks for Qg's own reasoning and suspects post 573,580: 1) novice 75% town, 2) injera no idea 50% 3) meiz no notice at all 4)zak town 5)Qgqq town 6 rowain: village lean 7 Molach: no opinion 8) Azza: insightful 9) waterbat suspicious 10) pindi: no idea 11) mero scum lean skipped 1213 serdoa villager 55% 14) bigger: he loves him for defending him, but 50% either way post 607: dont vote for me because novice said so! post 707: wot defending /answering several questions about his post restriction (literal) post 712: asks novice how long his PR is for post 753: lists: catwalk (admits to flip-flopping on him) catwalk, uberfish, selrahc, ichabod as suspects. votes selrahc. Lewwyn for mayor post 810: votes catwalk for being a parrot. and implies novice is not articulate post 812: off PC - back to limited posting post 832: not inarticulate, but less able to deliver arguments = on novice post 834: point was that catwalk echoing novice is bad for village post 845: supports uberfish's calling out of TT's post as "horrible" (no vote) post 851: attacks TT argument against uber post 863: claims uber as one of his main suspects, but doesnt understand why people who follow TT's reasoning post 872: votes Selrahc again after agreeing with jkaen post 1003: Quote:[color=red]icabod[color]want vote to count, not caught up wont be bak for 12pTT immediately thinks this is "not good" - agreed, in a *very* similar situation I chose to not vote, but i can understand wanting to have a vote count post 1186: Quote:Caught up. post 1187: asks novice for his list of suspects post 1195: Waterbat, you are a sexy beast - Gaspar (no this has nothing to do with Qgqqqqqq, but i'm repeating this every chance i can get) post 1335 after night phase: Quote:Just caught up.votes selrahc post 1433: getting more suspicious of Rowain, and then votes him post : warns about being away because a lady friend is staying over ( ok - i added "lady" it was the least i could do ) post 1484 - back to catwalk as a result of lewwyn's essay. post 1543: Quote:Agreeing with novice here, feels like a pretty pathetic role that wont stop anyone without a proper defence. ----------- f me... started writing this up well before Qgqqqqq's claim at 14:31 (eastern). well i guess I will stop with the new developments. Anyway. I really was hoping to get a read from the above before letting my vote stay on Qgqqqqqq. I'll admit that I didn't. What about his claim? I think the mafia is probably feeling pretty confident right now and might put in a fake claim to buy an extra day. I suspect Injera against Matt for this reason, but really suspect QGqqqqq as it was his head on the block. I'm inclined to leave my vote and take the result as a divine sign to lynch Injera tomorrow if he flips village. tally?
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
Well, considering that:
1. Believing in Qgqqqq is believing there's a tracker in the village and one in the Mafia (how would Injera know about Mattimeo no result if not for that?) 2. I think a tracker role is very weak, so when Injera made his claim, I'd jump at that very moment to accuse him on his lie, especially since I'd know he's a mafia power role (due to doing something to Catwalk). Losing my power is well worth it to catch a Mafia, way more than I'd believe it can accomplish. I'll vote for Qgqqqq.
So if we believe the two roles would not coexist then we either have:
Inj & Matt lying, Qg truth Qg Lying (other unknown) So we lynch Qg, we either hit a wolf, or we reveal 2 wolves. Is there a fault with that logic? |