WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[Molach]

I was halfway through posting something how if qgqqqqq was a wolf against the firing squad, a counter-claim to get Injera lynched instead would be a bonus even if lynched tomorrow, so I would go by my earlier suspicions.

Need a rethink.

[Injera]

Just wondering, the test Injera proposed doesn't work if he doesn't know who the person targeted. What made you think it would work that way, Injera?
It would not make much sense if we have villager tracker and villager tracker+

It would work, because if Mattimeo used his ability on himself I would get a no result, but if he used it on someone else I would see. So I it's a 50% chance to confirm he had the ability and that it wasn't a made up claim, which is where the suspicion is coming from.

[pindicator]

Thank you meiz

Injera

[Catwalk]

This is confusing, to say the least. I really want to vote Qg, on grounds of horrible defense. I still don't understand what the test is/was, and how it was supposed to work. Meiz, does your theory rely on both Injera and Mattimeo being scum?

[waterbat]

No, no, no, no, no.

Let's not fuck this up now with a stupid, waste of time, lynch on Selrahc.

It simply has to be Qgqqqqq now

I'm agreeing with TT89 a lot lately.

specifically , it has gotten to the point where my brain requires some sort of resolution, wrong or right. Actually - this is a personality trait which has bit me before in poker. I would require resolution / confirmation and often call on the river just to satisfy that urge. Wrong or right, I needed to KNOW. If we don't lynch Qgq^6, its yet another thing hanging over the village and we probably have lynched another villager on top of it all.

That being said - i certainly could also see us having follower and tracker on the village side. But remember brick said "for a fact" "no classic roles", which actually gives the wolfs cover to claim those roles. So..... im more inclined to believe follower than tracker was used in the game.

[novice]

It would work, because if Mattimeo used his ability on himself I would get a no result, but if he used it on someone else I would see. So I it's a 50% chance to confirm he had the ability and that it wasn't a made up claim, which is where the suspicion is coming from.

Wait so what was the test you proposed?

[BRickAstley]

Official Lynch Vote Count

Qgqqqqq - 10 - Molach, Selrahc, Catwalk, tasunke, Gaspar, Waterbat, Twinkletoes89, Ichabod, Jkaen, Mattimeo
Injera - 4 - Qgqqqqq, novice, Meiz, Pindicator
Catwalk - 2 - Injera, Azza
Selrahc - 1 - Lewwyn

Players not voting: Arromir, Rowain

[Injera]

Brick has confirmed I see "just the action."

Meiz, why wouldn't my test not work? You're not thinking this through.

[Meiz]

It would work, because if Mattimeo used his ability on himself I would get a no result, but if he used it on someone else I would see. So I it's a 50% chance to confirm he had the ability and that it wasn't a made up claim, which is where the suspicion is coming from.

Ok... that actually makes sense. I did not understand it correctly then...

Selrahc

[novice]

Brick has confirmed I see "just the action."

Meiz, why wouldn't my test not work? You're not thinking this through.

Explain again what test you had in mind. I think we misunderstood based on our own assumptions of how your role worked.