WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[novice]

TT, if you're always going to treat people agreeing with you with paranoia, you'll never get anywhere.

Btw I think my point that Mattimeo's role being selftargettable is poor design bears repeating.

[waterbat]

no chance Qgqqqqq comes back to self-defense vote, i guess

[pindicator]

Where did Qgqqqqq say he was using a phone, novice?

[novice]

Where did Qgqqqqq say he was using a phone, novice?

He didn't say that, it was the impression I got.

[Catwalk]

My main issue with the role is that it's a souped up baner. BRick strongly suggested that power roles wouldn't make or break the game, and that there would be no classic baner. Makes no sense that he'd instead add a baner with a bonus, far more likely he'd add a baner with some kind of limitation. I don't consider 3 shots to be a limitation, that's pretty standard in these games.

[waterbat]

quite a few of the qgqqqqq voters havent been here since the claim.....

[Ichabod]

Mattimeo

[Molach]

After last game I'd rather not go too heavy into meta - which roles fit which alignment. I thought qgqqqq acted suspicious and voted on that. Havent seen any content in posting to sway me on that.

Mattimeo will still be there for lynching tomorrow, and we should have additional info "he did not use power" or "He can cloak" to work with as well.

On another note, arromir will be modkilled in 15 minutes, and there seems to be less than 10 out 20ish people up for this lynch.

[Catwalk]

Molach, we're not so much discussing which roles would be what alignment. We're discussing which claims are likely to be outright false. "He will still be there tomorrow" can be used for every single decision, what makes this one any different? We won't have any new information on Mattimeo tomorrow.

[Rowain]

Mattimeo