September 27th, 2012, 15:08
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
Lewwyn is a blender - no previous wolf experience. You, me, Ichabod and Rowain would be the only realistic alphas.
I'm not saying we should look at novice right now, Catwalk, I was just responding to Rowain. I'm on Lewwyn primarily because his game has felt scummy, That it also fits my theory is just gravy.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
September 27th, 2012, 15:09
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
Maybe Injera too, I guess, on alphas.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
September 27th, 2012, 15:09
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
@Selrahc Do you have reliable connection now? I would love to hear your thoughts about those 4 days
September 27th, 2012, 15:11
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
Gaspar Wrote:Lewwyn is a blender - no previous wolf experience. You, me, Ichabod and Rowain would be the only realistic alphas.
Lewwyn has experience as wolf. Not here on RB but he played on another side and AFAIK he won there tricking everyone and then some.
September 27th, 2012, 15:13
Posts: 3,045
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2006
Gaspar, I think your grand theory goes down due to a fact that both thestick and Matt had strong roles. I just don't see wolves getting rid of them that easily just due to the players having the roles. Unless the wolves have even better PR's, which I find unlikely.
September 27th, 2012, 15:14
Posts: 3,140
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2009
Quote:@Selrahc Do you have reliable connection now? I would love to hear your thoughts about those 4 days
Yes I do, and I'm doing some rereading, trying to get better acquainted with how the game has flowed.
September 27th, 2012, 15:15
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
Alright, back to Lewwyn being scummy then. Why is this so? I'm not seeing it.
September 27th, 2012, 15:17
Posts: 821
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2011
pindicator Wrote:I did not vote like i did with the intention of drawing attention. But if the pattern is established enough that it is noticeable then it no longer draws the desired effect when I do want to pull it out.
Walk me through the first quote I gave, then, please. Maybe I'm misreading it but what do you mean by "I figured being away would make me an easier target, too."
September 27th, 2012, 15:27
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Catwalk Wrote:Gaspar Wrote:What I suggested last game night was that I think a lot of the post-lynch reactions were interesting - obviously there's that sort of "why we all play werewolf" emotional release at the end of it but I thought it was worth examining the number of players who sort of moved to a "SEE THIS IS WHY THIS CLEARS ME" posture in the post-lynch. Which other players' reactions strike you as peculiar?
Gaspar, I was also wondering who specifically you were referring to here.
@Pindicator:
pindicator Wrote:I did not vote like i did with the intention of drawing attention.
Then why did you find it so surprising that I didn't read you as doing that?
pindicator Wrote:You know what really surprises me injera? Not that someone's figured my MO - but that novice of all people voted for me right after you put it out there. Him and zak were the two I was hunting scum with when I did that in WW14; I would have thought of all people in this game he would be the one to notice that I was doing the same thing as I did in WW14.
In fact:
pindicator Wrote:I did not vote like i did with the intention of drawing attention.
pindicator Wrote:I was doing the same thing as I did in WW14.
Which one is it?
I have to run.
September 27th, 2012, 15:32
Posts: 821
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2011
Tasunke Wrote:his role is follower, meaning that he can only determine the name of the power used. Seems more like a role-scanner than an investigative role to me. Or namely, something more useful to wolves, perhaps. (unless of course a village follower finds a roleblocker, but in this power-lite setting I find that far less likely than a follower to just find other investigative roles or any protective roles).
I see what action(s) were done. Presumably that includes night kills as well.
You know, you made an argument that my role was more powerful than Qg's, which means the fact that I wasn't eaten is suspect, and when I push back you back off, and then come back with an argument that my role wouldn't be useful to the village and vote for me again? At this point I'm pretty sure you're just looking for a reason to vote for me.
/grudgingly withholds retaliation vote
|