As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer

Create an account  

 
WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER

Tasunke you do realize that you are randomly voting right now?
[Image: CmQTvVS.jpg]
Reply

Edit: I don't think you are lying about knowing where the card is due to absence of a counter claim. If anyone is the real miller, please come forward as 1:1 is terribad for
The wolves.
Reply

Ryan, I am not randomly voting. I hate day 1s and purposely act like an idiot due to that hatred, but I love the rest of the game and therefore try to get my lynch vote to always matter. I care far less about the mayor vote, but I am willing to vote mjw for mayor because why not. I suppose i could vote for
Either serdoa or Rowan for mayor, but unless mayor is u me or mjw I don't think it will matter. Cause otherwise mayor will probably die.
Reply

(January 5th, 2013, 08:56)Tasunke Wrote: Either serdoa or Rowan for mayor, but unless mayor is u me or mjw I don't think it will matter. Cause otherwise mayor will probably die.

Tasunke, why will they die if they are not one of you, Ryan or MJW? I do have my theory what you meant (and I could understand that comment in that case), but I'd like to hear from you if I am actually right.
Reply

Selrahc
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Reply

Yes, I meant that we are all somewhat erratic, or, in Ryan's case, at least new, and therefore wolves would tend to prefer not killing us.
Reply

An I also of course meant that mayors tend to be seen as semi confirmed villagers, and therefore tend to be night killed.
Reply

But Tasunke, what started this chain of questions was this statement by you:

"Lets assume that items aren't revealed. Then lets assume the scum already asked this and found out it was so. In that case, it would make perfect sense as a scum ploy. Nothing more dangerous than a fool card running amok that people thought was destroyed."

So the above is a scum ploy that makes perfect sense, according to you. How exactly would that scum ploy cause people to think the card was destroyed?

Is it so hard to understand what I'm asking?
I have to run.
Reply

@Serdoa

Seer guilty is still 100% reliable, and innocent is 90% reliable even if scum have control of the card, and scum might get caught lying about whereabouts of the card if they have it (of the remaining two scanning roles, item seer and watcher, at least one is probably town.)

Besides if scum have the card, whichever scum falsely claims to have the card is going to have a lot of attention on them and if anything it'll increase their chances of being lynched.

I'm not going to lynch a village leaning read over this.

*

I don't know if I have a slight bias towards Selrahc simply because he thinks along the same lines as I do regarding the fool card issue, but I don't feel his specific wording is that significant... I'm wary about phrasing "slips" because village doesn't tend to be very careful about its wording.

*

I find bigger doing absolutely nothing in his last few posts except giving Ryan "friendly" advice to be suspicious. Could well be scum waiting to see where the momentum shifts.
Reply

Gah I accidentally clicked the lurker thread but didn't read anything.
Reply



Forum Jump: