Posts: 3,916
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2011
Excellent. The negative reinforcement is working.
And hopefully Stick can play soon and we can get another double-turn in today 
Posts: 3,916
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2011
SAT, I hope to God you know what you're doing, the last thing you want is for you to lose your capital in 10 turns.
Posts: 5,323
Threads: 22
Joined: Feb 2012
Events of this game would indicate that, in fact, SAT does not particularly know what it's doing. or at least can't tell the difference between the right thing to do and the wrong thing to do  But this seems like the right thing to do.
Completed: PBEM 34g (W), 36 , 35 , 5o, 34s, 5p, 42, 48 and PB 9, 18, 27, 57
Current: PB 52. Boudicca of Maya
Posts: 3,916
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2011
Eh, as long as you don't threaten my cities, or settle any south of your current position. You could probably use a city 1NW of Tunic better than I will. That's forgivable.
Any further south, and let's just say that we don't want history to repeat itself
Posts: 5,323
Threads: 22
Joined: Feb 2012
well, this is a non-diplomacy game, and not-so-subtle threats about specific actions pretty much violates the non-diplomacy action.
I'll say this: you can clearly take that city with ease. Whether or not declaring war and thus hurting our defense is in your best interest... well, that's your choice. It would seem insane for us to try to settle further south. Currently, that city is using tiles that your city cannot. We may find that even spending hammers/time creating that city is a bad idea, I dunno.
I dunno - that may be more diplomacy than really should take place.
Completed: PBEM 34g (W), 36 , 35 , 5o, 34s, 5p, 42, 48 and PB 9, 18, 27, 57
Current: PB 52. Boudicca of Maya
Posts: 1,256
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2011
Nicolae Carpathia Wrote:let's just say that we don't want history to repeat itself  Auto-razing cities ftw.
Global lurker  ; played in Civ VI PBEM 4, 5, 15; DL suboptimal Civ VI PBEM 17
Posts: 1,256
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2011
AutomatedTeller Wrote:I dunno - that may be more diplomacy than really should take place. Seems fine to me. Banter thread implies that threats and limited diplo will take place since otherwise, why would you need a Banter thread? (hopefully not to discuss cooking recipes)
Global lurker ; played in Civ VI PBEM 4, 5, 15; DL suboptimal Civ VI PBEM 17
Posts: 3,916
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2011
I'm more annoyed you're not even using your land properly. You could have settled in a stronger, more defensive spot, that used up a riverside plains instead of a riverside grassland.
Posts: 5,323
Threads: 22
Joined: Feb 2012
Unless I'm missing something, that spot is illegal with Tunic where it is.
I'm not trying to be a jerk or anything, cause I really hope you don't kill our city... cause being at war with you kills us... I just want to be sure I'm not diplomacy-ing, is all.
Completed: PBEM 34g (W), 36 , 35 , 5o, 34s, 5p, 42, 48 and PB 9, 18, 27, 57
Current: PB 52. Boudicca of Maya
Posts: 3,916
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2011
I know, but Tunic is a terrible shitty city that doesn't have coastal access to the fish and a lighthouse.
|
