Insane Cop Posse: a ww minigame

[uberfish]

Brick I really don't like that explanation, I'd have bought it if you said that Matt was suspicious for focusing mainly on setup analysis rather than regular scum hunting as this is the reason why my townread on him isn't that strong. But I don't see his posts as being deliberately confusing. And you have also followed my read on Q as being scummy for *not* doing the analysis so...

[BRickAstley]

Stupid forum eating my posts.

I find that funny uber, because the majority of your contributions are also focusing mainly on setup analysis, so why do you say to find that scummy? I'm sorry you don't see him the same way I do. I'm not even sure that Matt was trying to be confusing, but when looking to you and Q as well and comparing the lot of you to try and find scum, Matt seems to be the one that looks potentially most guilty.

Also with Matt, in the page two exchanges, it looks like he's trying to get the credit for pointing out tasunke as confirmed village, when I did that already a few posts earlier. That also reads scum to me.

Sorry, I forgot our meta of everybody having to find a new and original opinion every time they offer a read on somebody. I will say that Q is slightly more villagey cause he does put in a call to make sure we coordinate our night 2 reads, which is essential. There's your not following.



Actually, uberfish, the more I think about it it looks like you're trying to set me up for an easy mislynch. you can't try to target me for following your lead. Especially with Q's small amount and content of posts, there's really not much variance in opinions that can be made on him. So if I copy an opinon already there? Oh look coasting scum. If I restate the argument? Oh look sneaky scum. If I try to connect up something else thats at best will be shaky and esoteric? Oh look misleading scum. No matter what I do, you've got an easy segue into setting up a mislynch, which is on a villager, and a villager whose death will tell even less than one of the rest of you, bar tasunke. ScumScumScumScum.

[Mattimeo]

Also with Matt, in the page two exchanges, it looks like he's trying to get the credit for pointing out tasunke as confirmed village, when I did that already a few posts earlier. That also reads scum to me.

The post before, 7 minutes preceding something that fairly obviously took more than 7 minutes to analyse; with no actual reasoning as to why, meaning an explanation as to how such a conclusion was reached was still necessary regardless of the cross-post.
Also, if you could point out where I in any way attempt to claim credit for fingering Tasunke as town, I'd be much obliged.

I'd have bought it if you said that Matt was suspicious for focusing mainly on setup analysis rather than regular scum hunting

Of course, were I to engage in scum hunting in what you would consider a 'regular' manner, you'd point out the marked change in methods and use that as the reason for reticence in a town read.

[uberfish]

LOL? Since when do I find matt scummy? he's a town read, just not a super strong one because scum can do analysis too.

And btw, if I was scum and wanted an easy mislynch I'd just sit on Q with 2 other people voting him and you calling him scummy... so yeah... that's a massive overreaction to my vote.

At this point I think Brick is just stretching to find reasons to vote people. My vote on him stands

[uberfish]

I'd have bought it if you said that Matt was suspicious for focusing mainly on setup analysis rather than regular scum hunting

Of course, were I to engage in scum hunting in what you would consider a 'regular' manner, you'd point out the marked change in methods and use that as the reason for reticence in a town read.

Actually, no I wouldn't have.

[BRickAstley]

I'd have bought it if you said that Matt was suspicious for focusing mainly on setup analysis rather than regular scum hunting as this is the reason why my townread on him isn't that strong.

I guess I just thought that not having a strong town read is somewhat analogous to having somewhat of a scum read. Especially here where there's nothing strong readwise.

[BRickAstley]

Also with Matt, in the page two exchanges, it looks like he's trying to get the credit for pointing out tasunke as confirmed village, when I did that already a few posts earlier. That also reads scum to me.

The post before, 7 minutes preceding something that fairly obviously took more than 7 minutes to analyse; with no actual reasoning as to why, meaning an explanation as to how such a conclusion was reached was still necessary regardless of the cross-post.
Also, if you could point out where I in any way attempt to claim credit for fingering Tasunke as town, I'd be much obliged.

Oh, yeah I didn't notice that it was only 7 minutes beforehand. Never mind.

[uberfish]

So, erm:

1) Is anyone actually playing this game?

2) Do we have a tiebreak mechanism?

[uberfish]

I mean I'll switch back to Q if I have to, but really I'd just rather lynch brick today. I feel his accusations against other players were really forced, like he felt he "had" to find some reason to be suspicious of people. And that's scummy behaviour

[BRickAstley]

So, erm:

1) Is anyone actually playing this game?

I feel kinda demotivated with it, like with this small amount of players, and most all of the knowledge available having been of a definite nature and already fleshed out, there's not much to do but wait around and get info from a lynch.

(side note: now that we're playing it, I think I don't really like this minigame all that much)