March 14th, 2016, 00:55
(This post was last modified: March 14th, 2016, 00:56 by mackoti.)
Posts: 3,978
Threads: 31
Joined: Feb 2010
(March 13th, 2016, 16:46)pindicator Wrote: We need a 3rd party to look into this. Off the top of my head I want to say gift your map to everyone when you first meet them, but hell, I'm biased since I'm playing.
Well I would say lets make trading maps avaible, why to stay in darknes with shity land, nothing to hide hereand of course like a punish for OH he should gift maps,ha ha.
Posts: 2,036
Threads: 9
Joined: Nov 2013
No, guys, this cant work this way. I think OH and whoever he has traded map to are NOT allowed to get circumnavigation from now.
Posts: 3,978
Threads: 31
Joined: Feb 2010
(March 14th, 2016, 01:07)OT4E Wrote: No, guys, this cant work this way. I think OH and whoever he has traded map to are NOT allowed to get circumnavigation from now. Oh i forgot about that...,but what is done is done sowhat you sugest?
Posts: 8,786
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
I've pmed ceiliazul to ask if he wants to admin this for us.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
Posts: 2,036
Threads: 9
Joined: Nov 2013
(March 14th, 2016, 01:41)mackoti Wrote: (March 14th, 2016, 01:07)OT4E Wrote: No, guys, this cant work this way. I think OH and whoever he has traded map to are NOT allowed to get circumnavigation from now. Oh i forgot about that...,but what is done is done sowhat you sugest? Well circumnavigation is not gone yet. So if they have units heading to the other side of the globe they either draw them back or make sure they have evidence to provide to judge that they have revealed every meridian with their own unit before they complete it. And nobody exchanges maps further before we accept it by unanimous decision.
Posts: 3,978
Threads: 31
Joined: Feb 2010
(March 14th, 2016, 04:17)OT4E Wrote: (March 14th, 2016, 01:41)mackoti Wrote: (March 14th, 2016, 01:07)OT4E Wrote: No, guys, this cant work this way. I think OH and whoever he has traded map to are NOT allowed to get circumnavigation from now. Oh i forgot about that...,but what is done is done sowhat you sugest? Well circumnavigation is not gone yet. So if they have units heading to the other side of the globe they either draw them back or make sure they have evidence to provide to judge that they have revealed every meridian with their own unit before they complete it. And nobody exchanges maps further before we accept it by unanimous decision. Well lets vote, I am totaly for map exchange.If we dont have an agreement on that i totaly agree with you.
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2013
I'd say get a 3rd party to look at the extent of the map trade and make sure neither party benefits until they've had units defog the land manually.
I don't want to just turn map trading on now.
-We lose the fun of exploring the map ourselves(why I originally voted for it off).
-We've been playing under the assumption of no trading so far. Maybe I would have traded maps with a neighbour 30t ago if that was an option?
Posts: 3,978
Threads: 31
Joined: Feb 2010
(March 14th, 2016, 04:49)The Black Sword Wrote: I'd say get a 3rd party to look at the extent of the map trade and make sure neither party benefits until they've had units defog the land manually.
I don't want to just turn map trading on now.
-We lose the fun of exploring the map ourselves(why I originally voted for it off).
-We've been playing under the assumption of no trading so far. Maybe I would have traded maps with a neighbour 30t ago if that was an option? You had writing 30 turns ago?I see your point here , but someone already gain very important time on scouting why to handicap ourselves and not get same beneffit,only if you dont wanna trade..., thats a different story.
Posts: 2,036
Threads: 9
Joined: Nov 2013
I am not against map trading if circumnavigation is done (without it) and all others agree. Though I do not think that it is fair to oblige somebody to trade their map, even as a punishment, because it hard to implement at least.
March 14th, 2016, 07:39
(This post was last modified: March 14th, 2016, 07:41 by Commodore.)
Posts: 18,036
Threads: 164
Joined: May 2011
C-nav isn't a huge deal anymore, but OH and Mysterio do have a leg up now, unless they don't. ![tongue tongue](https://www.realmsbeyond.net/forums/images/smilies/RBOld/tongue.gif) I actually prefer map trading allowed in general (think we voted for it on), but in this case since we've been playing without it and working under that assumption for a while, I'd say no to trades. OH and Mysterio say oops and Ichabod links the Calvin and Hobbes "I'm really sorry" song and play on, I'd say.
|