Ok, thoughts on Brick
VOTES
Day 1: Azza > Lewwyn > Tasunke (to save himself)
Day 2: Azza
Day 3: Slowcheetah
Scum Tells?
- mood swings, blah blah, Day 1 case.
- repeated pattern of promising to really hunt 'tomorrow', and then contributing little before finally showing up in the last 6 hours. This
- won't place actual votes until the end of the day
- this post feels scummy to me:
(May 30th, 2013, 12:33)BRickAstley Wrote: Because the day had already gone on long enough that I felt it had moved out of the starting of day pressure votes. And sorry that my time zone pings your scumdar. :P
- when he does vote, puts his vote on candidates that will look good to his pursuers.
Town Tells
- Other than the one I quoted, I think his Day 2 and 3 posts sound fairly reasonable
- His fight against Azza wasn't as out of the blue as I thought - he's on Azza Day 1, big attack Day 2, and presses him again Day 3
- Unless he's allied with Zak, why would scum Brick kill Ichabod, who had been a much-needed defender of his?
And on Azza:
VOTES
Day 1: Azza > Rowain > Tasunke
Day 2: Gazglum > Brick > Serdoa
Day 3: Rowain
Scum Tells?
Day 1 he counterattacks a lot (or jokes 'everyone is scum!'), is defensive, and guilts Serdoa about
(May 23rd, 2013, 12:27)Azza Wrote: Attack someone who isn't known for being particularly good at defending themselves, who has exposed themselves.
Day 2 I'm not going to repeat everything from yesterday, but I agree with Brick was right about Azza's case on me being weak. He backed down in the level of his accusations, but it felt more in response to others not backing him than what i was saying in my defence. He says that I am scummy "for not pushing cases", but his own pushing, me aside, is anemic.
(May 28th, 2013, 02:08)Azza Wrote: I have a different playstyle to most here, that doesn't make me scummy. The case you've created is based on misinterpretations, ignoring context, the occasional blatant falsehood and a flat dismissal of my Gazglum case for no reason other than you don't agree with it.
That's a silly thing to say. Obviously people dismiss cases because they don't agree with them. That's why they dismiss them. Plus, Brick didn't just say, "no lolz @ Gaz case", he went through it post by post.
Day 3: Not impressed by Azza today.
I was, he implied, still his highest suspect at the end of Day 2. But he hasn't touched me at all so far, where's the consistency? Nor did he again attack 'ham-fisted' scummy Brick. He says he's suspicious of SLowcheetah and does what seems like a pressure vote on Rowain. Still no real pushing cases.
Where's the evidence Azza marshalls for his 'cases'? There is none, it's all in his stomach:
(May 29th, 2013, 23:38)Azza Wrote: My gut says Rowain is scum, but I can't find any good evidence to back up my gut feeling.
(May 30th, 2013, 01:58)Azza Wrote: If i had some actual evidence proving it was you, id post that. But my gut says it's you, so Im going to stick with that for now.
Rowain is also another potential target of convenience for a mislynch, after the Serdoa strangeness Day 2.
Finally, and pretty damningly. I meant what I said that I thought the meta discussion was a distraction, and that a distraction favoured scum, especially Brick/Azza. But I didn't realise till rereading that the big meta discussions was started by...
(May 30th, 2013, 04:29)Azza Wrote: How were the roles in this game distributed?
(May 30th, 2013, 04:30)Azza Wrote: (May 30th, 2013, 04:29)Azza Wrote: How were the roles in this game distributed?
That doesn't sound right.
What set up are we using? Do we have enough knowledge from that to narrow down what roles may be left and how many scum we're hunting?
Town Tells?
- He's consistent in his support for Mattimeo
- He came back to Rowain after being suspicious of him way back in Day 1
- He didn't jump on the anti-Zak case, when he easily could have. He defended Zak, which I agree with.
- His posting style is more or less in character.
Still, looking at it overall, I feel comfortable going back to
Azza for now.