Tech Thread - EitB XXVI

[spellman]

My Recommendation: All players submit Top 3 Civ/Leader choices to Qgqqqqqq. Traditional restriction (no Os-Gabella of Luchiurp).

[Qgqqqqq]

Yeah I think that's what's going to happen (aside: if so send them to hawk2370@gmail.com its more conveniant), I am more interested in a map brief.

Mods: there seems sufficient interest in this for a subforum.

[Whosit]

Map? I dunno, something standard, whatever that is? Don't pull punches with Barbs, is my vote. If I die because of my own stupidity, that should at least be amusing for someone.

[Qgqqqqq]

So no barbs at all or no editing barbs?

[Ellimist]

All I know is that I want Perpentach.

I can't help but think of this:

lol whosit you have so many wars looming on the horizon you just can't decide who to attack Every other time you post it's Death to Inca! Korea Must Die! Danstki shall pay! You play with all the finesse of a hippo on meth with severe ADD.

[Whosit]

Yes, that is in fact exactly the inspiration for my pick here. Seems like a natural fit!

[Qgqqqqq]

I thought selrahc was the hippo on meth?

[Sian]

Yeah I can take the civs and dole out leaders, restricted is traditional.

And since we're Green, what are 'traditional restrictions' ??

[Qgqqqqq]

I meant civs match leaders

Only traditional bans ate keelyn and stasis (I disagree with stasis though)

[Sian]

ahh ... i thought you were talking usual bans