Diplo:
First off, let’s send that screenshot over to Iskender and let him see the good news.
Pb Wrote:Hi Iskender,
Good choice of city, here's what the hawk saw:
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2507/...t0003v.jpg
There's one hunter in there, that's it.
I guess they don't think you're a threat.
Also - I promise that Giant with Combat promotions in the South isn't mine!
If you want me to send a unit down there to kill it, just let me know.
Kind Regards,
Pb, Scouting Boy-King
That should provoke a positive reaction!
Iskender Wrote:OK, thanks!
…
Okay, getting a little concerned now.
In fact, scratch that, I’m downright concerned.
I know when people are acting flakey and having second thoughts, (trust me I have plenty experience with it).
And Iskender, well he’s acting a little flakey.
No: “Ok, cool that opens the way for your plan them, I’m happy to provoke the Calabim and start a war so long as you commit to fully defending me.”
No: “Okay, well we need to work out the details, but I want that city and I’m willing work with you against the Calabim so long as I get it”
Not even: “Fine, let’s meet up on chat again to discuss what to do from here.”
Two words, that’s it.
It was odd enough to make me go through every single message Iskender and I have ever exchanged.
He has never given me such a short reply, ever.
It’s always been ‘acknowledgement + clarification’, here are some examples:
Iskender Wrote:Ok, thanks for the heads up. My settler will be on the site next turn.
Iskender Wrote:I could have it in the BFC, but the city would be in an extremely poor location, probably not worth it.
Iskender Wrote:All right, thanks for the chopping. I'll re-offer cease fire next turn.
And this isn’t some minor city-settling or chopping matter we’re talking about here, this could be a game defining alliance.
So I’m not sure – I picked up this hesitation in our last chat and that screenshot doesn’t seem to have improved things.
I think either he needs more convincing (there’s not much more I can offer…
or maybe I need to be more forceful? Maybe he’s one of these people that feels the need for others to make the decision for him?
I really don’t know. I waited another day or two with no word from the Hippus, and then went and chased Iskender…again.
But while I was crouching on Gchat, waiting to pounce on an unsuspecting Hippie, my lovely Illian neighbour came calling!
Quote:(12:19:58 PM) pocketbeetle: Interested in the most recent FFH2 PBEM1 gossip?
(12:20:25 PM) Selrahc: Heh, sure. I was going to suggest the same thing.
(12:20:29 PM) Selrahc: What have you heard?
(12:20:40 PM) pocketbeetle: weeeel
(12:20:52 PM) pocketbeetle: three days ago, Cull told me he has a nap with bob until T200
(12:21:07 PM) pocketbeetle: I was warning him about Bob possibly thinking of attacking
(12:21:07 PM) Selrahc: Ick. Alright.
<<snip irrelevant fussing with Gchat settings>>
(12:23:11 PM) pocketbeetle: and then
(12:23:24 PM) pocketbeetle: Cull sent me an email yesterday, telling me he has now extended that nap
(12:23:40 PM) pocketbeetle: I'm in the process of asking for how long, but obviously it's longer than T200
(12:23:49 PM) pocketbeetle: And he sounded pretty laid back
(12:23:57 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.
(12:24:20 PM) Selrahc: Well if Bob isn't going to attack him.. he isn't in much threat.
(12:24:33 PM) Selrahc: I'm not eager to lose the mana he's giving me.
(12:24:50 PM) pocketbeetle: Your nap with culls runs out soon doesnt it? Ah okay, yup true
(12:24:57 PM) pocketbeetle: Has he asked for an extension at all?
(12:25:03 PM) Selrahc: No.
(12:25:14 PM) pocketbeetle: okay,
(12:25:15 PM) pocketbeetle: So then I chatted with Iskender
(12:25:32 PM) pocketbeetle: They've still got the T200 nap, but Iskender says Bob has approached him looking to extend it
(12:25:48 PM) pocketbeetle: And apparently Bob now has Feudalism as of this turn
(12:26:00 PM) pocketbeetle: Sooo. Not Sareln. Not Cull. Probably not Iskender
(12:26:06 PM) pocketbeetle:
(12:26:26 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.. thing is.. Bob's been on me asking for trade agreements.
(12:26:33 PM) pocketbeetle: Really. Oh dear for me
(12:26:50 PM) pocketbeetle: What sort of trades?
(12:27:11 PM) Selrahc: Open borders, fur for wines/gold. Something like that.
(12:27:52 PM) Selrahc: We haven't agreed to anything yet. we were trying to work out why we don't currently have a trade route first.
(12:28:23 PM) Selrahc: I'd actually consider the possibility that Bob isn't planning on using his vampires yet.
(12:28:33 PM) pocketbeetle: Well, obviously I can't tell you what to do. But if you're getting enough trade routes from my settlements (surely?) then I'd appreciate you not boosting Bob's research rate any more than necessary via trade routes
(12:28:35 PM) Selrahc: But waiting until he has a truly devastating army of them.
(12:28:56 PM) Selrahc: I'm actually maxing out foreign trade routes right now.
(12:29:12 PM) Selrahc: Due to discovering trade and adopting foreign trade.
(12:29:16 PM) pocketbeetle: Good, yeah I noticed
(12:29:28 PM) Selrahc: Hence the GNP going above 300 suddenly.
(12:29:54 PM) Selrahc: What happened to yours though? It's more or less doubled in the last ten turns!
(12:30:09 PM) pocketbeetle: As for Bob not attacking anyone. Comon dude. Did I mention he threatened me with war the other day?
(12:30:23 PM) pocketbeetle: I moved Vanilla Ice near his border
(12:30:30 PM) Selrahc: You think you're the target?
(12:31:03 PM) pocketbeetle: I think he's going to attack someone. I think we're the only two not covered by a NAP, and unless he's bluffing with the trade stuff, then yes I guess it's me
(12:31:15 PM) Selrahc: He'd have to make a deal with Iskender in that case to get access.
(12:31:20 PM) pocketbeetle: true
(12:31:28 PM) pocketbeetle: Although Zaonce is a bit exposed
(12:31:28 PM) Selrahc: I can guarantee you that I'll not let him use my lands to attack you.
(12:31:41 PM) pocketbeetle: Really? I appreciate that. It helps
(12:32:21 PM) Selrahc: No problem. I'm not looking to stab you in the back here.
(12:32:44 PM) Selrahc: I'll keep you updated if Bob comes looking for an alliance against you as well.
(12:33:07 PM) Selrahc: Oh, and speaking of which. You've got Iskender quite paranoid.
(12:33:18 PM) pocketbeetle: Thankyou. Do me a favour also, build a few extra units. That way, if he does come, then you can at least consider helping (you may choose not to, but at least you'll have the choice!)
(12:33:36 PM) pocketbeetle: Why so?
(12:33:41 PM) Selrahc: Skyships.
(12:33:46 PM) pocketbeetle: lol?
(12:34:26 PM) Selrahc: I can kind of see his point. They're really fast. But I would certainly be more scared of the vampires.
(12:34:44 PM) Selrahc: "I'm writing to ask what do you think about the prospect of Pb getting
Airships filled with commando troops able to fork cities in 10+ tile
radius, striking from above a peak or from the ocean. Do you think
there's a way to counter it? I'm sceptical.
(12:34:46 PM) Selrahc: "
(12:34:49 PM) pocketbeetle: Why on earth would I build skyships with raider units?
(12:34:51 PM) pocketbeetle: sec
(12:35:29 PM) pocketbeetle: well sure, but I'll still have to unload them, at which point just gank them
(12:35:45 PM) pocketbeetle: They're damn expensive hammerwise and at the nd of the tree also
(12:35:49 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.
(12:36:03 PM) Selrahc: On Erebus maps they're really good.
(12:36:10 PM) Selrahc: Not so sure on this one.
(12:36:14 PM) pocketbeetle: I always regarded them as novelty units, designed to let you complete a conquest victory if an AI is on another continent and all 4 megacities are landloakced
(12:36:18 PM) Selrahc: (Because they can hover over mountains)
(12:36:30 PM) pocketbeetle: Yeah. Wish I could find a griffon to capture
(12:37:01 PM) Selrahc: Yeah, thats their purpose, but they are fairly fun units.
(12:37:08 PM) Selrahc: I don't really share Iskenders fear of them though.
(12:38:03 PM) pocketbeetle: How weird. I'll try and have another look at them, but I agree. I've only ever built 1 ever.
(12:38:31 PM) pocketbeetle: Do you mind if I ask Iskender about this, or would you prefer I pretend you've never said anything?
(12:38:37 PM) pocketbeetle: No probs if so
(12:38:44 PM) Selrahc: Hm.
(12:39:00 PM) Selrahc: Um.. I think I'd prefer if you not bring it up with him.
(12:39:31 PM) pocketbeetle: Yeah sure
(12:39:56 PM) pocketbeetle: But my response anyway, is that they're Queen of th eline replacements, needing Astronomy which is a what? 8-10k beaker tech?
(12:40:11 PM) pocketbeetle: No way I'm spending that much on a continent map for some fun floaty things
(12:40:19 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.
(12:40:24 PM) Selrahc: I get that.
(12:40:42 PM) Selrahc: I need to think up a response, but I'll do my best to put that acorss.
(12:40:52 PM) Selrahc: *across
(12:40:57 PM) pocketbeetle: as for my GNP, I got envious of your third GA and decided I wanted one too
(12:41:24 PM) pocketbeetle: Fired off a one man GA, think you used your GSci for the same yup?
(12:41:32 PM) Selrahc: Right. Fair enough. I guess that explains it.
(12:41:32 PM) Selrahc: Yeah
(12:41:45 PM) pocketbeetle: With Bob sabre rattling, I thought it best to knock off a few more techs
(12:41:54 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.
(12:42:00 PM) Selrahc: Uh, speaking of that.
(12:42:16 PM) Selrahc: The insane increase in my GNP caused me to change plans slightly.
(12:42:27 PM) Selrahc: I'm going to grab arcane lore with Tower.
(12:42:49 PM) Selrahc: Since sorcery dropped to a seven turn tech, while I had 6 turns left on the tower...
(12:43:13 PM) Selrahc: I'm thinking I can afford a 1t delay in order to grab a much more expensive technology.
(12:43:37 PM) pocketbeetle: Interesting
(12:44:11 PM) Selrahc: It was also in part because some of the potential mages were lagging in xp.
(12:44:26 PM) Selrahc: I'd currently only be able to get 2 out of 5!
(12:44:29 PM) Selrahc: Which isn't great.
(12:44:47 PM) Selrahc: A few turns later might see all of them ready for action.
(12:45:07 PM) Selrahc: Kind of wish I was arcane.
(12:45:15 PM) Selrahc: Charismaatic can only get you so far.
(12:46:01 PM) pocketbeetle: Must admit that's a bit annoying
(12:46:03 PM) Selrahc: Any thoughts?
(12:46:18 PM) Selrahc: Oh. How so?
(12:46:20 PM) pocketbeetle: Well, yeah. I wanted it ^^
(12:46:42 PM) Selrahc: The free Great Scientist? Tough. Can't have all the great people
(12:46:46 PM) pocketbeetle: But, I guess I can't beat you to it, so such is life
(12:46:52 PM) pocketbeetle: exactly
(12:47:10 PM) Selrahc: I'd think the great bard and great commander are good enough.
(12:47:21 PM) pocketbeetle: very true
(12:47:28 PM) pocketbeetle: but
(12:47:54 PM) pocketbeetle: you have to promise to forgive me my next cheeky action, whatever it is
(12:48:17 PM) Selrahc: I generally forgive them anyway, so sure.
(12:48:23 PM) pocketbeetle: lol true
(12:48:27 PM) pocketbeetle: ty
(12:49:01 PM) pocketbeetle: oh, rok priest finishing this turn
(12:49:11 PM) Selrahc: Ah. Cool.
(12:49:15 PM) pocketbeetle: where do you want him?
(12:49:37 PM) Selrahc: I'll be slaving out the monument this turn, so it shouldn't be long before the dyes are back in your command.,
(12:49:41 PM) Selrahc: Silent Night I think.
(12:49:57 PM) pocketbeetle: ok
(12:50:13 PM) Selrahc: Unless it gets RoK before then.
(12:50:21 PM) pocketbeetle: no chance!
(12:50:35 PM) pocketbeetle: bob is getting all my spreads fos some reason ffs
(12:50:58 PM) Selrahc: Yeah. I think I must have something like a 1 50th of the chance, given how long we've had trade routes.
(12:51:14 PM) pocketbeetle: seriously, it took me like 50t to get my first internal spread
(12:51:19 PM) pocketbeetle: screwy map!
(12:51:35 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.
(12:51:54 PM) Selrahc: I think you did pretty well in completely shutting down the religion game.
(12:52:11 PM) pocketbeetle: Eh, bad timing in saying that. Iskender is founding Emp soon
(12:52:12 PM) Selrahc: Since its T160 and only you and the elves have a state religion!
(12:52:30 PM) Selrahc: Ah. Fair enough.
(12:52:41 PM) pocketbeetle: I found out a little too late unfortunately, or I might have been tempted :D
(12:52:45 PM) Selrahc: Surprised you haven't taken it.
(12:52:50 PM) pocketbeetle: lol
(12:53:18 PM) Selrahc: It's a pretty damn good military reigion. Nice fit for Hippus.
(12:53:38 PM) Selrahc: Really fast, blinding light chariots everywhere.
(12:53:43 PM) pocketbeetle: Yeah Chalid. Not sure about that
(12:53:59 PM) pocketbeetle: Wouldn't like Chalid coming after me
(12:54:14 PM) Selrahc: No. He is nasty.
(12:54:16 PM) pocketbeetle: ah well. Things'll hopefully work out
(12:54:21 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.
(12:54:28 PM) Selrahc: Things are certainly hotting up again.
(12:54:48 PM) Selrahc: We've had a good period of peace now.
(12:55:00 PM) Selrahc: But everyone will soon be getting their superweapons.
(12:55:04 PM) pocketbeetle: True. Damn Vampires.
(12:55:11 PM) Selrahc: Yeah.
(12:55:11 PM) pocketbeetle: What? What's my superweapon?!?!
(12:55:18 PM) pocketbeetle: Someone tell me quick!
(12:55:18 PM) Selrahc: Airships
(12:55:22 PM) pocketbeetle: whaaaaaaaaa
(12:55:25 PM) pocketbeetle: lmao
(12:55:44 PM) pocketbeetle: ah well. Thanks for the chat then dude , I guess I need to go find another tech to divine
(12:56:06 PM) pocketbeetle: I'm thinking.... Mithril working?
(12:56:14 PM) Selrahc: Heh. That would be cool.
(12:56:22 PM) Selrahc: Not much use for the centaurs though.
(12:56:24 PM) pocketbeetle: bit of a long wait :/
(12:56:40 PM) pocketbeetle: Yeah. Nevermind. Catch you later, I'll go play the turn
(12:56:49 PM) Selrahc: Alright. Seeya.
(12:56:50 PM) pocketbeetle: cya
There were several things that struck me in that chat, and writing this a couple of days later, it may turn out to be the most important one in the game so far.
First off, my worst fears are realised, Selrahc is going to ToD Arcane Lore, and there is nothing I can do about it.
He’ll get the free GSci which I had wanted to build an Academy in KK.
What went wrong?
I planned on Selrahc getting one GA, didn’t plan on a second.
Was it worth giving him the Sun mana to enable this to happen? Maybe with the Shrine of Sirona free hammers factored in, but probably not.
Such is life.
Secondly, and I may end up owing Selrahc for this, is the following line:
Quote:(12:31:15 PM) Selrahc: He'd have to make a deal with Iskender in that case to get access.
Not because he’s right, he’s actually wrong and I correct him shortly after. Bob could attack via Zaonce or Riedquat and then use the roads.
Why it’s so important is that it got me thinking about the possibility of Bob and Iskender actually working together.
Up until now, I’ve been stupidly naïve and working on the assumption that Iskender and I were talking in a vacuum, that Iskender has not been communicating with the Calabim.
Part of that assumption is based on the Hippus history with the Calabim (war, enforced settlement agreement which according to Iskender, the Calabim have violated by proxy) which has made me think their communications have been limited to something similar to Kurio-Calabim relations, ie general insults, the occasional badly veiled threat etc.
The other reason for me holding that view is because
Iskender never mentions talking to the Calabim, nor does he ever go into any details.
But
of course he’s talking to the Calabim, he probably approached them at the same time as me, except saying that it was Leesti that was the offending city instead of Sareln’s Thariss.
I know what his options are, I’ve listed them out in this thread, and I know he’s not a stupid person. He’s going to explore all his options, map out the potential gains, and then like the mercenaries he’s supposedly playing, go with the highest bidder.
However therein lies the rub.
If he’s conducting an auction for his services, why is he not letting me know there are other bidders in an attempt to drive up his price? Is he leaving it unspoken and assuming I should’ve figured it out for myself?
Why is he not letting me know what Bob is offering, so I can counter-offer?
The honest truth is,
I can’t offer much more , maybe he’s not quite comprehending what I’m putting on the table?
Either way, I’m assigning myself my heaven-knows-what-number-we’re-on
smiley for being so freaking dense.
Newly emboldened, I set off to find the Hippus leader and make him realise what a damn good deal I’m offering, even if I have to ram it forcibly down his throat.
Quote: (1:46:42 PM) pocketbeetle: Hi Iskender
(1:46:49 PM) Iskender: hey Pb
(1:47:05 PM) pocketbeetle: I saw your quick reply to that screenshot, what are your thoughts?
(1:47:23 PM) Iskender: i'm workig on a plan
(1:47:37 PM) pocketbeetle: would that plan involve me?
(1:48:07 PM) Iskender: you realize that my only serious units for some time will be rathas
(1:48:33 PM) Iskender: i think that maybe i could lure bob's stack somewhere near my border and then immobilize it
(1:48:56 PM) pocketbeetle: Well look, before we start getting into specifics, let's get the groundwork sorted
(1:49:51 PM) pocketbeetle: What I'm asking is: are you interested in a military alliance vs the Calabim, to remove or lessen the threat of Vampires. Territory gains would be pretty much exclusively yours, nomatter who does most of the action
(1:50:12 PM) pocketbeetle: You approached me a couple of days ago asking if I was interested, I'm saying yes
(1:51:30 PM) Iskender: i'm curious why do you need me in this operation actually. it looks like there's little I can do at the moment, apart from these rathas
(1:52:23 PM) pocketbeetle: ? I need you because I'm production limited Iskender. I have four cities...total. I can mass a decent force, but for me to feel confident in attacking Bob, I'd like an ally
(1:52:46 PM) pocketbeetle: Understand something
(1:53:03 PM) pocketbeetle: My time of leading the demographics is coming to an end
(1:53:10 PM) Iskender: are you ready to give me all his land for assistance of a couple of rathas?
(1:53:18 PM) pocketbeetle: Bob already beats me in crop, soon he will beat me in mfg goods etc
(1:54:13 PM) Iskender: i think he's been beating you in mfg for a long time (gov. manor hammer bonus)
(1:54:27 PM) pocketbeetle: I've been wondering that Is it not counted?
(1:54:28 PM) Iskender: but that's beside the point, sorry
(1:54:43 PM) Iskender: it's not included in demos
(1:55:06 PM) pocketbeetle: Well, sucks to be me then. So basically he's kicking all our asses, and now he has his superunit
(1:55:16 PM) pocketbeetle: I have my GNP, that's it
(1:55:27 PM) pocketbeetle: Regarding your last question
(1:56:13 PM) pocketbeetle: I'm willing to tell you I have no intention of settling in the SE. So if we take out Bob, yes it's yours. So long as - you are a serious and committed ally
(1:57:15 PM) pocketbeetle: You seem to be having trouble getting your head around the idea: I don't need land anymore Iskender
(1:57:16 PM) Iskender: aren't you afraid that with all that land I might actually be a worse threat than Bob?
(1:58:18 PM) pocketbeetle: At the moment you are the third highest rival. Bob I consider either 1st or 2nd. It's in my interest to weaken Bob
(1:58:50 PM) pocketbeetle: This is your time Iskender. Your time to dictate the terms
(1:59:45 PM) Iskender: let me give you an update on the situation with Sareln first
(2:00:00 PM) pocketbeetle: Sareln is irrelevent Iskender
(2:00:05 PM) Iskender: he may give me the wheat and maybe the bronze
(2:00:19 PM) pocketbeetle: We're talking about Bob here, and an alliance vs him
(2:00:58 PM) Iskender: ok, so what are your expectations about my part in that military alliance
(2:02:14 PM) pocketbeetle: I expect you to be committed. Depending on how YOU want to play it, and what Bob does, we can either joint attack, or defend the person he attacks then counter
(2:02:57 PM) pocketbeetle: I don't want to go into specifics until we at least have an understanding Iskender
(2:04:52 PM) Iskender: so you want me to be your ally and promise that I'd get Bob's land, but it's unclear how or when it'd happen
(2:05:23 PM) Iskender: i'm surely not equipped to conquer his cities myself. not now at least
(2:06:19 PM) pocketbeetle: Not at all. I'm happy to go into specifics once I understand we're together and on the same page.
It would be silly of me to reveal war plans and my army composition without being certain that someone was with me
(2:07:13 PM) Iskender: i understand that
(2:07:28 PM) Iskender: let me think about it
(2:07:46 PM) Iskender: that's quite the most important decision i'd make in this game
(2:08:01 PM) pocketbeetle: What is there to think about Iskender?
(2:08:18 PM) pocketbeetle: What are the options you are considering?
(2:08:21 PM) Iskender: a lot
(2:08:36 PM) Iskender: how it would end
(2:08:40 PM) Iskender: how i would end up
(2:09:05 PM) pocketbeetle: that's not an option Iskender. That's an outcome.
(2:09:10 PM) pocketbeetle: What are your options at this time?
(2:09:24 PM) pocketbeetle: Let me tell you what I've written in my thread
(2:09:33 PM) pocketbeetle: I think you have three options at this point
(2:09:51 PM) pocketbeetle: You are out of land and boxed in. You can either:
(2:10:07 PM) pocketbeetle: 1) Attack Bob with me. Possible to gain a lot of strong land
(2:10:31 PM) pocketbeetle: 2) Attack me with Bob. Possible to gain some land, less good and badly placed cities
(2:10:51 PM) pocketbeetle: 3) Focus inwards. Maybe summon Mercurians/Hyborem etc.
(2:11:02 PM) pocketbeetle: I think 3 is a bad idea
(2:11:09 PM) pocketbeetle: Obviously I think 2 is a bad idea also
(2:11:14 PM) Iskender: i labeled them A B C
(2:11:35 PM) pocketbeetle: So Bob has approached you?
(2:11:46 PM) Iskender: and C is what Sun Tzu recommends
(2:11:48 PM) pocketbeetle: Or have you approached Bob?
(2:12:04 PM) Iskender: i've came up with these myself
(2:12:15 PM) Iskender: i mean in my thread
(2:12:32 PM) pocketbeetle: Okay. So what did Bob say? What is he offering that I'm not?
(2:13:07 PM) Iskender: he didn't offer anything. he's not the kind of guy that tends to be generous
(2:13:57 PM) pocketbeetle: So why do you need time to decide then???
(2:14:13 PM) pocketbeetle: Do you think I've got no hope vs him, even if you help?
(2:15:10 PM) Iskender: on the contrary. but i need to see if i could gain more by getting involved than by not getting involved
(2:16:47 PM) pocketbeetle: Okay, but if Bob and I fight, he wins. I die. Do your chances of winning improve substantially?
Your neighbour still has more land. And now he'll have an experienced army.
(2:17:41 PM) pocketbeetle: You know that if I go, it's pretty much guaranteed you'll be next...
(2:19:14 PM) Iskender: ok, to be honest. my best option is to see you two hurt youself as badly as possible. if i support one side and it wins decisively i will not have gained anything
(2:19:26 PM) pocketbeetle: That's true.
(2:19:50 PM) pocketbeetle: Okay, so you're thinking the remain neutral, focus inwards option is better for the moment?
(2:20:25 PM) pocketbeetle: (Actually I don't agree with that last part) You'd gain a lot if we won decisively, but nevermind, ignore for th e sec
(2:20:40 PM) Iskender: if i was sure it's better i wouldn't have approached you
(2:22:21 PM) pocketbeetle: Okay. Well, I'll let you think about this for a little bit longer then Iskender.
I'm honestly having difficulty seeing why it's a hard decision. I think I'm much nicer than scary Vampires ( ) But nevermind
(2:22:42 PM) Iskender: you are, that's true
(2:22:56 PM) pocketbeetle: But, I will need a decision soon Iskender. Let me know
Have to be honest, I ended that chat with a bad feeling.
Question:
Quote: (1:49:51 PM) pocketbeetle: What I'm asking is: are you interested in a military alliance vs the Calabim, to remove or lessen the threat of Vampires.
Answer: (Dodge)
Quote: (1:51:30 PM) Iskender: i'm curious why do you need me in this operation actually. it looks like there's little I can do at the moment, apart from these rathas
Excuse:
Quote: (1:57:16 PM) Iskender: aren't you afraid that with all that land I might actually be a worse threat than Bob?
When you’re being offered a good deal, do you often try and talk the other person out of it?
Question: (what are your terms?)
Quote: (1:58:50 PM) pocketbeetle: This is your time Iskender. Your time to dictate the terms
Answer: (Attempt to dodge, cut him off)
Quote: (1:59:45 PM) Iskender: let me give you an update on the situation with Sareln first
Question:
Quote: (2:00:19 PM) pocketbeetle: We're talking about Bob here, and an alliance vs him
Attempted excuses:
Quote: (2:04:52 PM) Iskender: so you want me to be your ally and promise that I'd get Bob's land, but it's unclear how or when it'd happen
(2:05:23 PM) Iskender: i'm surely not equipped to conquer his cities myself. not now at least
Then delay:
Quote: (2:07:13 PM) Iskender: i understand that
(2:07:28 PM) Iskender: let me think about it
I try to press him, he agrees (?) with my summary of his options.
Question:
Quote: (2:12:32 PM) pocketbeetle: Okay. So what did Bob say? What is he offering that I'm not?
Answer:
Quote: (2:13:07 PM) Iskender: he didn't offer anything. he's not the kind of guy that tends to be generous
This just isn’t good.
The Illians until this point have been my allies of convenience.
We’ve worked around each other, made mutually beneficial trades when one of us needed something, and have generally gossiped a bit.
Yet while Selrahc seems quite happy to inform me about when he talks to Bob (possible trade routes in last chat, when he was considering trading maps a while ago) and give me some details on those chats, Iskender not only tells me no details, but shrugs off the suggestion that they’ve even communicated recently (despite the fact Iskender is still supplying Bob with Gems, shouldn’t that deal have ended by now?).
So if Bob’s offering nothing, then surely I’m the clear winner here?
What’s the indecision about?
Does he think I’ve got no chance, and joining me would mean certain doom?
Question:
Quote: (2:13:57 PM) pocketbeetle: So why do you need time to decide then???
(2:14:13 PM) pocketbeetle: Do you think I've got no hope vs him, even if you help?
Answer:
Quote: (2:15:10 PM) Iskender: on the contrary.
Hooray a proper answer!
But then he goes and fucks it up by guess what? Dodging again!
Quote: (2:15:10 PM) Iskender: …but i need to see if i could gain more by getting involved than by not getting involved
Continuing with the dodging:
Quote: (2:19:14 PM) Iskender: ok, to be honest. my best option is to see you two hurt youself as badly as possible. if i support one side and it wins decisively i will not have gained anything
This is just plain wrong and I should have shredded this sentence.
If he joins me and beats the Calabim, he makes
huge gains! And I gain shit all except for a stronger neighbour and some wasted hammers on dead troops.
Contrast that to joining the Calabim to take me out, he gets shittier land (if he’s given any at all) a stronger militaristic neighbour, and a new extended front with guess what?
Another militaristic neighbour!
It’s such a clear choice.
Why is he being so thick?
So maybe this isn’t going to happen, maybe he really is considering option 3?
Question:
Quote:(2:19:50 PM) pocketbeetle: Okay, so you're thinking the remain neutral, focus inwards option is better for the moment?
Answer: (Dodge/delay)
Quote: (2:20:40 PM) Iskender: if i was sure it's better i wouldn't have approached you
A person who is looking to get out of a deal would’ve jumped on this.
It’s basically an offer to go back to the status quo, and if he should change his mind, he can always approach me again and say so.
Instead he’s keeping me hanging, keeping me wondering.
WHY?
So I ended that conversation with a reasonably strong impression that this deal isn’t likely to happen, and it’s going to be me alone vs the Vamps.
Then I went back and reread the chat with Selrahc, and something struck me.
Quote: (12:34:44 PM) Selrahc: "I'm writing to ask what do you think about the prospect of Pb getting
Airships filled with commando troops able to fork cities in 10+ tile
radius, striking from above a peak or from the ocean. Do you think
there's a way to counter it? I'm sceptical.
(12:34:46 PM) Selrahc: "
I laughed this off and treated it like a daft suggestion at the time (which it freaking is!)
But then I realised, not only is the person I’m proposing a military alliance to being extremely reticent, he’s also sending emails to my neighbour trying to make me more scary, trying to isolate me. (Although couldn’t he have found a better subject matter? Like my GNP or my wonder hogging?)
It’s exactly what I’ve been doing with the Calabim’s neighbours, and we all know why I’ve been doing that.
So, on one hand, I’ve got a neighbour who has been honest to the best of my knowledge for the entire game - I’ve yet to catch Selrahc in any kind of deception. It’s possible he misled me deliberately regarding ToD’ing Sorcery vs Arcane Lore, but in the end I gave him that Sun mana without asking what he was going for (because I thought he wouldn’t be able to reach it), nor did I ever reveal to him my plan for going for Arcane Lore.
Was it blatantly obvious everyone would try to take Arcane Lore?
Maybe, especially considering the way I’ve clearly been prioritising the ‘free GP’ techs, so maybe there’s a black mark against Selrahc there.
In the end however, he’s also making offers like the following, unasked and unprompted:
Quote:(12:31:28 PM) Selrahc: I can guarantee you that I'll not let him use my lands to attack you.
(12:31:41 PM) pocketbeetle: Really? I appreciate that. It helps
(12:32:21 PM) Selrahc: No problem. I'm not looking to stab you in the back here.
(12:32:44 PM) Selrahc: I'll keep you updated if Bob comes looking for an alliance against you as well.
Whether those are binding in a court of Civ law, I don’t know (sirius stuff :rolleyes
but…it counts for something with me.
In fact it counts for a lot.
While on the other hand, my proposed military alliance partner refuses to even comment on whether he’s talking to someone or not.
And it gets worse.
….
Oooh cliffhanger!
Anonymous lurker #1 that signed up just to comment on this thread Wrote:Why Pb your ability to create dramatic tension is simply superb!
Why yes yes, thankyou!
Anonymous lurker #2 that signed up just to comment on this thread Wrote:Pb you must be the bestest evar!
Well maybe not the best, but certainly up in the top two or so, I must modestly agree.