I honestly have no idea what you're getting at Rowain. I think you're trying a little too hard, actually. As I said earlier, I find it either suspicious or weird to make any substantial accusations on day one, barring anything highly suspicious such as yelling that you're a wolf.
Still, I will attempt to explain my highly thought out posts so far:
1) I make a light-hearted post suggesting that we keep shifting blame and see who hangs. Part joke, part serious. My point was that we'll likely pick someone at random anyway, I elaborated on that later on. Sue me for trying to be a little bit funny at the same time.
2) novice suggests that my ideas are as horrible in the two past games (granted, I haven't had a lot of luck yet with the wolf catching). I throw a vote back on him for fun, for calling me hare-brained.
3) Big conspiracy theories start.
I don't know what this says about anyone's possible guilt or innocence, but I'm not impressed with the reasoning. I've had a bad habit previously of voting for those I thought were using flawed logic, reasoning that either they were wolves or less useful villagers. In just about all cases, they were just bad villagers.
novice is not a bad guess, as it does in fact look like he was buddying up a little (even if it was by insulting my skills). Especially if he doesn't a history of suggesting someone is innocent early on. Either that, or he's just observing that I'm playing like I usually do (which is not really a reliable indicator of guilt, though). I suppose it's pretty unfair to novice to suspect him based on him suggesting I'm innocent, but WW doesn't have to be fair
Last game I almost got lynched for tactically buddying up with someone, let's see what happens in a game where I make an effort not to make friends.
But as stated previously, I think we're mostly just tossing a d11 on day 1 and hoping it ends up 1, 2 or 3. Doesn't mean we shouldn't try to pick up on leads, but let's not blow them out of proportion.
