Potential double move situation with dazedroyalty - would be grateful for advice.
Regarding Thing 2 above, after my move dazedroyalty built a city where his settler was. Since I clearly had a settler on the island and a military unit, this would seem the sort of situation in which turn order should be observed, something especially important since dazedroyalty's city was undefended and that it was impossible for him to garrison it the next turn.
However, he took his next turn in the first half of this turn, before me (there were 28 hours left on the clock when I logged in). It is my intention to declare war on him and move my axeman back onto the hill whence he was thrown when the city was built with a view to razing his city next turn. The thing is, now I am taking my turn in the second half of the turn, it *is* possible for him to reinforce his city in time. If I was on the first half of the turn, it would not be possible for him to do so.
Of course, I could double move him now and the net effect would be the same - I'd take the undefended city, as I would have done if dazedroyalty had kept to the second half of the turn. But before making an arsehole move like that I wanted to see whether a) my cause is just and b) whether there is a better way of rectifying the situation.
Regarding Thing 2 above, after my move dazedroyalty built a city where his settler was. Since I clearly had a settler on the island and a military unit, this would seem the sort of situation in which turn order should be observed, something especially important since dazedroyalty's city was undefended and that it was impossible for him to garrison it the next turn.
However, he took his next turn in the first half of this turn, before me (there were 28 hours left on the clock when I logged in). It is my intention to declare war on him and move my axeman back onto the hill whence he was thrown when the city was built with a view to razing his city next turn. The thing is, now I am taking my turn in the second half of the turn, it *is* possible for him to reinforce his city in time. If I was on the first half of the turn, it would not be possible for him to do so.
Of course, I could double move him now and the net effect would be the same - I'd take the undefended city, as I would have done if dazedroyalty had kept to the second half of the turn. But before making an arsehole move like that I wanted to see whether a) my cause is just and b) whether there is a better way of rectifying the situation.

