WW37- For Whom the Bell Trolls

[Shadeun]

My role is The Bell with the two abilities "For Whom?" and "Toll"

With "For Whom?" I pick a target and Bob flips a coin. If its heads ("Me") I die and tails ("Thee") the target dies.

The nature of the "Toll" ability should be immediately apparent.

Unlike Vampires you can see that this fits in well with the book (I assume, I haven't read it)

My victory condition (which my Liberty Bell picture should have given away) is that I win when democracy comes to our (admittedly fucked up) village.

[Shadeun]

I'm not sure the anarchists are on the level. Why would Gazglum vote for a 24 hour day? I'd think the Anarchy vote would be for a 17 hour day (or some other crazy number). Suspicious.

[Mattimeo]

My victory condition (which my Liberty Bell picture should have given away) is that I win when democracy comes to our (admittedly fucked up) village.

uh... zak? Lewwyn? I thought he was one of yours?


Also, Rowain: Assuming that a faction that started with 3 people has an ability to recruit more (to get your two moles) really, really isn't the 'safe' option. Especially when there will be a Communist bloc that, if there is even a single non-them death, can stall out the day at a minimum.

Even assuming your ludicrous 'super anarchist-vampire' theory - what are you going to do tomorrow? Kill another anarchist and just hand the game to the (then, clear) Communist majority? 'Cause if you seriously think there's 5 on our team today, you'll think there are 4 (or, logically, 5, since if we have been recruiting we're *still damn well recruiting*, given novice had nothing to do with us) still around tomorrow, and thus you will throw the game away chasing ghosts while the Communists just laugh at you.

[Gazglum]

I don't want to side with the communists, that's just handing them victory.

Look, speaking to all 3 fascists now, we want to work with you. We hang a communist today, then its 3/3/3 and you two factions can have a fair gunfight with each other tonight to try and shift that balance in your favour. In the worst case scenario you both drop to 2 members, and then you can gang up on us tomorrow, and we go into the next night 2/2/2 with a chance to play it out again.

We don't have moles in your organisations, we did not start with a 5 man faction and complete knowledge of all night actions. If we did, then we would have made sure that you guys were killing each other for a start.

Crosspost with Matt.

[Mattimeo]

I'm not sure the anarchists are on the level. Why would Gazglum vote for a 24 hour day? I'd think the Anarchy vote would be for a 17 hour day (or some other crazy number). Suspicious.

I'm not sure you understand the term 'anarchist' in this instance.

We had well functioning factories, in places even better than before, run under a socialistic worker's rule, before you nuts and the Fascists decided to come and spoil our quite egalitarian enclaves.

I mean, our take on socialism actually worked until it was invaded from without. Much better than you can claim about yours.

[Shadeun]

I'm not sure the anarchists are on the level. Why would Gazglum vote for a 24 hour day? I'd think the Anarchy vote would be for a 17 hour day (or some other crazy number). Suspicious.

I'm not sure you understand the term 'anarchist' in this instance.

We had well functioning factories, in places even better than before, run under a socialistic worker's rule, before you nuts and the Fascists decided to come and spoil our quite egalitarian enclaves.

I mean, our take on socialism actually worked until it was invaded from without. Much better than you can claim about yours.

You'll hear no complaints about workers rule under democratic leadership. Soon our factories will be restored and our economy will boom.

The fear of waking to needle like pricks on your children's necks has abated and now is the time to step into the glorious future of democracy in Europe. (and the bailouts that come with it)

[Rowain]

Also, Rowain: Assuming that a faction that started with 3 people has an ability to recruit more (to get your two moles) really, really isn't the 'safe' option. Especially when there will be a Communist bloc that, if there is even a single non-them death, can stall out the day at a minimum.

So you are now arguing that I should lynch commies while you yourself pledged

Communists, listen not to this Fascist, demanding answers from you before he will accede to civil discussion.
Do not even listen to my erstwhile friend, for I fear he takes the cause of Anarchism too far, even unto his own mannerisms and thought patterns. Nothing good can ever come of that.

We feel that we would be much more palatable allies to you than these Fascist pigs. As you well know, the roots of our Anarchism have always been socialistic in nature. The factories, even regions, we have liberated and defended against the Fascists have been managed by rule of the common man. Do we not have this in common? Are we not infinitely closer to your base ideology than you are to these authoritarian, dictatorial Fascists?

Facts:
Surviving factions are 4-3-3, with possible variance from novice's recruitment.
We do not have a night kill. We are here to defend what is ours, and complicate efforts by others to kill us off.
We'd be willing to jump on a Fascist today, rather than a Communist. 4-2-3 would force co-operation tomorrow. Same as we assume Rowain was intending, just off Gaz last minute to force us into the same situation.

Rowain

to kill me. Are you kidding me?

[zakalwe]

Rowain, am I right in guessing that two of the fascists have identical roles with each other? Or so they claim?

[Rowain]

I don't want to side with the communists ....

Understandable as I hope the commies will help lynch you

[Rowain]

Rowain, am I right in guessing that two of the fascists have identical roles with each other? Or so they claim?

What is your role in that chaos zak?