December 29th, 2010, 10:02
Posts: 6,893
Threads: 42
Joined: Oct 2009
Enough discussion, I think  . I would like to see this finally starting up.
GES: I suggest you make the final desicions based on the discussion. I don't care about the method or ban list too much. I hope you decide no barbs. All other unsettled question are pretty indifferent to me.
December 29th, 2010, 10:14
Posts: 686
Threads: 8
Joined: Feb 2010
ManiaMuse Wrote:I'd be willing to lurk for you. I don't think I have enough time to be a full team member but I'd be happy to follow your thread, offer whatever advice I can and take over if you ever need someone to play your turns.
Sound good?
Your Hired!! - Thanks ManiaMuse 
December 29th, 2010, 11:17
Posts: 2,313
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2010
Well, I assume Krill needed to know the number of teams before creating the map.
Right now, we have 9-10 teams. sunrise I believe said he would be making a final decision today one way or the other.
So far the only real request for Krill has been to let the players know the map wrap you choose before leader/civ selection is made. Have you made a decision on that Krill?
Once we know the map-wrap, if voting hasn't further clarified those last few points, I will make a decision on them.
December 29th, 2010, 11:29
Posts: 23,434
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
How many players again?
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
December 29th, 2010, 11:31
Posts: 2,313
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2010
We have 9 total civs right now. If sunrise plays, that would make 10. He said he would give us an answer today after talking to Rego.
December 29th, 2010, 11:56
Posts: 6,471
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2006
Gold Ergo Sum Wrote:We have 9 total civs right now. If sunrise plays, that would make 10. He said he would give us an answer today after talking to Rego.
Yeah, I've not forgotten. In fact, how could I when Krill hit me up in the LoL lobby to ask
December 29th, 2010, 11:57
Posts: 23,434
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Pidgin was behind LoL, and hey, I'm lazy. I'm not going to Alt-Tab unless I'm forced to.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
December 29th, 2010, 14:08
Posts: 2,504
Threads: 29
Joined: Oct 2009
Lord Parkin Wrote:Maybe it's just me, but for a no-tech trading game I really don't value Expansive and Creative on the same tier as Financial - Financial is far and away the best trait for this variant.
Hey Lord Parkin,
Firstly, welcome to RB!
Secondly, i heavily disagree with the above point. I totally respect where you're coming from but financial is, in my view, just a lot easier to leverage. I would say it probably is a photo-finish between Financial and Expansive. Creative would be very close behind and Philosophical not miles behind that.
December 29th, 2010, 15:34
Posts: 2,313
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2010
Atlas1998 PM'd me and let me know that he would rather play than lurk, but would like a teammate. I guess I misinterpreted his initial post on the thread. My mistake.
Any of the current five civs that don't have a partner/lurker interested in teaming with Atlas1998?
December 29th, 2010, 16:10
Posts: 2,868
Threads: 15
Joined: Sep 2010
Sure, I'll team with him.
|
![[Image: 1367939.png]](http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/1367939.png)
